Top Kissmetrics Alternatives & Competitors based on 274 Reviews
Reviews collected from
alternativeto.net
capterra.com
gartner.com
trustpilot.com
trustradius.com
sitejabber.com
facebook.com
.
| Brand | Pricing |
|---|---|
|
|
Kissmetrics offers a customized pricing model tailored to the needs of businesses. Pricing is not explicitly stated on the website, indicating potential customers should contact sales for a custom quote. |
|
☆ ☆ |
|
|
☆ ☆ |
|
|
☆ |
|
|
☆ ☆ |
Hotjar provides a tiered pricing structure with a free plan, Basic, Plus, Business, and Scale plans. The free plan offers limited features, while the paid plans start at $39 per month and go up to around $989 per month, depending on the number of sessions and features included. |
|
|
|
|
☆ |
|
|
☆ |
Mixpanel’s pricing is based on the number of data points tracked and includes a free tier for smaller projects. Paid plans start at $25 per month for the Growth plan and can escalate based on usage, with enterprise solutions available that require custom quotes. |
|
☆ ☆ |
Tableau offers a variety of plans, including Tableau Public for free, Tableau Creator starting at $70 per user/month, Tableau Explorer at $35 per user/month, and Tableau Viewer at $12 per user/month. Pricing varies based on the features and functionality required. |
Compare your brand to your competitors
Why should you be looking for a Kissmetrics alternative?
Users may seek alternatives to Kissmetrics for various reasons, including specific feature requirements, ease of use, budget constraints, and varying support options. Those looking for robust analytics may explore Amplitude, while Google Analytics offers a free, user-friendly solution for web tracking. Heap Analytics provides automated event tracking, and Hotjar specializes in user feedback. Looker and Microsoft Power BI cater to business intelligence needs, while Mixpanel focuses on product analytics. Tableau stands out for its data visualization capabilities. This article will delve into features, pricing, and target users for these top alternatives.
Quick Overview of Top Kissmetrics Competitors
-
Amplitude (Best Kissmetrics Alternative for Product Analytics)
Focuses on product analytics, providing extensive cohort analysis and user journey mapping. Its event tracking capabilities help businesses understand user behavior deeply, making it a strong competitor for those needing advanced insights. -
Google Analytics (Cheapest Kissmetrics Alternative)
Offers robust web analytics with free to mid-tier pricing options. It provides comprehensive traffic analysis, user demographics, and behavior insights, making it an accessible choice for those looking for a cost-effective option. -
Heap Analytics (Best Kissmetrics Competitor for User Experience)
Automatically captures every user interaction without requiring manual tracking setup. Its retroactive data analysis feature enables teams to explore and analyze user data from any point in time. -
Hotjar (Kissmetrics Alternative for User Feedback and Behavior)
Combines heatmaps, session recordings, and user feedback tools. It excels in understanding user behavior through visual data and direct feedback, making it ideal for enhancing UX/UI. -
Looker (Top Kissmetrics Competitor for Data Visualization)
Provides powerful data exploration and visualization capabilities with a focus on business intelligence. Its customizable dashboards and collaborative tools offer a unique approach to data analysis and reporting. -
Microsoft Power BI (Robust Kissmetrics Alternative for Business Intelligence)
Offers advanced data modeling, visualization, and integration with Microsoft products. It’s ideal for organizations already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem, providing in-depth reporting and analytics capabilities. -
Mixpanel (Strong Kissmetrics Competitor for Behavioral Analytics)
Specializes in tracking user engagement and retention with an emphasis on actionable insights. Its advanced segmentation and funnel analysis features help businesses optimize their product and marketing strategies. -
Tableau (Premium Kissmetrics Alternative for Interactive Data Analysis)
Known for interactive data visualization tools that allow users to create comprehensive dashboards with drag-and-drop functionality. It supports real-time data analysis and is ideal for enterprises needing detailed, visual storytelling with their data.
Kissmetrics Alternatives: Feature by Feature Comparison
| Feature | Amplitude | Google Analytics | Heap Analytics | Hotjar | Looker | Microsoft Power BI | Mixpanel | Tableau | Kissmetrics |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| User Behavior Tracking | Deep and granular insights into user behaviors, including cohort analysis. | Tracks basic user interactions and funnels, albeit with less granularity. | Automatic capture of all user interactions without manual tagging. | Heatmaps show user interactions visually for quick insights. | User-specific analytics, enabling powerful behavior analysis across models. | Data modeling and integration from multiple sources to analyze behavior more effectively. | Cohort analysis to view user retention and engagement over time. | In-depth visualization of user behavior trends with adaptable dashboards. | Focused on customer journeys but less granular compared to Amplitude and Mixpanel. |
| Segmentation | Advanced segmentation capabilities allow for detailed audience targeting. | Basic segmentation tools mostly limited to demographic data. | Instinctive segment creation based on user actions without complex queries. | Limited to feedback categories rather than detailed user segmentation. | Offers customizable segments based on diverse KPIs and metrics. | Allows extensive segmentation through powerful queries and filtering options. | Segmentation based on specific user actions and events is strong but not as customizable as Amplitude. | Dynamic segments that can adapt to changing data and user behavior. | Segmentation capabilities exist but are less user-friendly than competitors. |
| Cohort Analysis | In-depth cohort analysis to track user retention rates effectively. | Basic cohort analysis but lacks advanced features for deeper insights. | Sophisticated cohort formation based on user actions automatically tracked. | No cohort analysis, focuses more on feedback and session recordings. | Cohort analysis capabilities that allow visualization of behaviors over time. | Can create cohorts but often requires complex DAX expressions for detailed analysis. | Provides cohort tracking but not as robust or intuitive as Amplitude. | Cohorts can be created, but with more manual setup and less automation compared to Amplitude. | Limited cohort tracking features compared to others; primarily focuses on conversion metrics. |
| Event Tracking | Event-based tracking with precise control over custom events and properties. | Event tracking available but relies more on setup and labeling for custom events. | Auto captures a wide array of events without needing to predefine them. | Event-based data collection is limited to recording sessions and feedback. | Comprehensive event tracking with the ability to link events back to specific user actions. | Supports extensive event tracking but can be complex to set up for non-technical users. | Robust tracking of events with a focus on user interactions that drive conversions. | Event tracking with customizable dashboards but requires manual tagging for detailed insights. | Requires setup of events manually which can be cumbersome for users. |
| Real-time Analytics | Provides real-time data visualization to track user interactions as they happen. | Offers real-time data with standard lag typical of GA’s processing. | Real-time data capture and instant cohort generation ensure immediate insights. | Limited real-time insights; focused more on retrospective analysis of user feedback. | Real-time reporting capabilities enhance decision-making for active monitoring. | Real-time analytics capabilities but often delayed due to data processing times. | Real-time data analytics enable quick responses to user behavior changes. | Interactive real-time dashboards that visualize data and foster quicker insights. | Delays in data reporting can hinder timely response to user behavior changes. |
| Visual Reporting | Interactive charts and graphs tailored for user experience analysis. | Visual reporting capabilities but less customizable compared to data-specific tools. | A range of automatic visualizations that simplify data comprehension. | Provides user feedback visualizations but limited in advanced analytics reporting. | Advanced visual reporting options with rich data storytelling features. | Rich, interactive visuals and reports with the ability to share and collaborate. | Strong visualization techniques focus on user engagement and retention metrics. | Highly customizable reporting features enhance visual storytelling of data. | Standard reports exist but aren’t as customizable or engaging as competitors. |
| Integrations | Extensive integrations with other tools in the tech stack for a seamless experience. | Integrates well with Google ecosystem and a range of third-party tools. | Automatic data integrations reduce setup time and complexity. | Integrates with various tools but focused mainly on session recordings and feedback tools. | Strong API framework for custom integrations across various platforms. | Excellent integration capabilities within Microsoft’s ecosystem, including Azure. | Integrations available but can vary in complexity compared to Amplitude. | Supports various third-party integrations but may lack depth in specific niches. | Limited integrations with other platforms; often reliant on manual data entry. |
| Dashboard Customization | Highly customizable dashboards to fit specific analytics needs of the business. | Limited dashboard customization compared to dedicated BI tools. | Customizable dashboards tailored to real-time user experiences and engagement. | Dashboard customization is limited; primarily focused on feedback metrics, not analytics. | Highly customizable dashboards that provide insights tailored to users’ needs. | Extensive customization options for dashboards that cater to specific reporting needs. | Good dashboard customization, though less flexible than Looker or Power BI. | Strong customization features for creating bespoke visual reports and dashboards. | Basic dashboard customization; limited flexibility compared to others in the market. |
| Specialized Features | Advanced predictions and anomaly detection, leveraging machine learning. | Basic predictive analytics with less emphasis on advanced modeling. | Automatic event tracking leads to unique insights without needing upfront configuration. | Focus on user feedback with tools for surveys and user behavior recording. | Powerful analytic modeling capabilities allow for deep data exploration. | Predictive analytics and machine learning integrations for advanced insights. | Predictive features are strong, focusing heavily on user behavior modeling. | Strong usage of AI for predictive analytics and user-driven insights. | Focus mostly on conversion metrics without predictive capabilities beyond basic forecasting. |
This table provides a comprehensive comparison of the key features across popular analytics and business intelligence tools, highlighting areas where they excel relative to Kissmetrics, along with unique and superior aspects that may benefit users.
Compare your brand to your competitors
Integration Capabilities for each Kissmetrics competitor
| Alternative | Supported Integrations | Compatibility Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Kissmetrics | Segment, Zapier, Shopify, WordPress, Salesforce, Stripe, Mailchimp, Cloudinary, Custom API | Strong compatibility with marketing and e-commerce tools. |
| Amplitude | Segment, Slack, Zapier, Salesforce, Google Ads, Facebook Ads, Intercom, Marketo, Google BigQuery | Well-suited for product analytics and marketing automation. |
| Google Analytics | Google Ads, Search Console, YouTube, Firebase, BigQuery, Shopify, Zapier, WordPress, Data Studio | Extensive integration with Google’s ecosystem. |
| Heap Analytics | Segment, Zapier, Salesforce, Document, Intercom, Shopify, Marketo, Mailchimp, Slack | Focuses on data capture and product analytics. |
| Hotjar | Zapier, Shopify, WordPress, Squarespace, Wix, HubSpot, Salesforce, Mailchimp | Strong user feedback tools complement analytics. |
| Looker | Google BigQuery, Snowflake, Redshift, PostgreSQL, MySQL, Salesforce, Zapier | Integrates seamlessly with Google Cloud and data warehouses. |
| Microsoft Power BI | Azure, SQL Server, Google Analytics, Salesforce, Mailchimp, Facebook, Excel, Dynamics 365 | Excellent for business intelligence from diverse sources. |
| Mixpanel | Segment, Zapier, Salesforce, Shopify, Intercom, QuickBooks, Mailchimp, Drift | Focused on product analytics with strong marketing integrations. |
| Tableau | Salesforce, Google Analytics, SQL Server, AWS, PostgreSQL, Microsoft Azure, Excel, Google Sheets | Robust visualization capabilities with various data sources. |
Pros and Cons of each Kissmetrics Alternative
Here’s a concise comparison table detailing the primary pros and cons of each alternative to Kissmetrics:
| Alternative | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Amplitude | – User-friendly interface for cohort analysis | – May lack in-depth demographic analysis compared to Kissmetrics |
| – Strong event tracking and user journey mapping | – Pricing can be high for small businesses or startups | |
| – Real-time data analytics and reporting | – Requires some learning curve to leverage advanced features | |
| Google Analytics | – Extensive integration with other Google services | – Limited in tracking individual user behavior compared to Kissmetrics |
| – Free version available with a robust feature set | – Customization and advanced tracking can be complex to set up | |
| – Universal tracking capabilities for multiple platforms | – Sampling issues with large datasets | |
| Heap Analytics | – Automatic event capture without manual tagging | – User interface can be overwhelming for new users |
| – Strong capabilities in customer journey tracking | – Limited customization in reporting compared to Kissmetrics | |
| – Visual data exploration tools | – Pricing may escalate significantly with user count | |
| Hotjar | – Excellent for understanding user behavior through heatmaps and session recordings | – Not primarily focused on analytics; more on UX insights |
| – Offers feedback tools such as surveys and polls | – Limited data analysis capabilities compared to Kissmetrics | |
| – Easy to set up and use | – Data retention is limited compared to other analytics tools | |
| Looker | – Strong data visualization and exploration capabilities | – Requires SQL knowledge for effective usage |
| – Excellent for large data sets and business intelligence | – Higher complexity and cost compared to Kissmetrics | |
| – Can integrate well with existing data sources | – Steeper learning curve for non-technical users | |
| Microsoft Power BI | – Robust data visualization functionalities | – Integration with non-Microsoft services can be challenging |
| – Affordable with many pricing options for businesses | – Can be complex to set up for non-technical users | |
| – Strong support for data collaboration and sharing | – Limited website tracking capabilities compared to Kissmetrics | |
| Mixpanel | – Focus on user engagement metrics and cohort analysis | – May be costly for advanced features or larger volumes |
| – Excellent with event-driven analytics | – Less user-friendly than Kissmetrics for novice users | |
| – Robust segmentation capabilities | – Limited visualization and reporting compared to competitors | |
| Tableau | – Highly advanced data visualization and reporting capabilities | – Complex setup and may require technical expertise |
| – Extensive data source connectivity | – Higher cost compared to Kissmetrics for full features | |
| – Strong community and resources for learning | – Limited support for real-time analytics |
This table captures the specific strengths and weaknesses of each alternative in relation to Kissmetrics, considering typical use cases for digital analytics and tracking.
Kissmetrics vs Competitors: Traffic & Marketing Comparison
Traffic Comparison
In analyzing organic traffic for the brands, Amplitude stands out remarkably with an average monthly traffic exceeding 1 million, peaking at around 1.18 million. Tableau follows closely, reaching a monthly peak of approximately 12 million. Google Analytics also shows significant traffic, peaking at over 2.5 million, while Hotjar maintains high traffic, close to 3 million. Conversely, Looker and Kissmetrics attract the lowest traffic, peaking at approximately 44K and 14.9K, respectively, indicating substantial differences in market reach and brand visibility.
Top Performing Keywords
For Kissmetrics, leading keywords include "web traffic" and "analytics 4," showcasing strong rankings. Amplitude leverages keywords like "analytics platform" and "data analytics," with many in the top 3. In contrast, Google Analytics has prominent ranking for "track website traffic" and "sign up for google analytics." Hotjar effectively ranks for diverse terms, including "website analytics." The varied keyword strategies suggest that while some brands focus on broad categories, others target niche aspects, influencing traffic sources and visibility effectively.
Conclusions on Visibility and Reach
Overall, Tableau and Amplitude claim the lead in online visibility through substantial organic traffic and keyword diversity. Google Analytics also showcases strong visibility, supported by high-ranking keywords. Meanwhile, Hotjar performs commendably in user behavior insights. Notably, Kissmetrics and Looker lag in traffic and keyword strength, indicating a need for strategic improvements in digital marketing to enhance their online presence and competitive edge within their respective niches.
Compare your brand to your competitors
Other “Kissmetrics” Alternatives & Competitors that you can find for free
Here are five alternatives and competitors to Kissmetrics:
-
Segment
- Key Features: Customer data platform, API integrations, data routing, user identity tracking.
- Trends: Increasing focus on data privacy and integration of various marketing channels.
- Value Proposition: Centralizes and organizes customer data, allows for easy integration with multiple marketing tools, enhancing customer insights and personalized marketing.
-
Pendo
- Key Features: Product analytics, user engagement tracking, in-app messaging, feedback collection.
- Trends: Growing emphasis on user experience and product-led growth strategies.
- Value Proposition: Helps businesses understand user behavior within their products and improve user onboarding and retention through targeted messaging.
-
Crazy Egg
- Key Features: Heatmap tracking, A/B testing, scroll maps, user session recording.
- Trends: Rise in the importance of user behavior analysis for website optimization.
- Value Proposition: Provides visual insights into how users interact with web pages, enabling effective website optimization and improved conversion rates.
-
Funnel.io
- Key Features: Data integration, reporting automation, multi-channel data aggregation, dashboard creation.
- Trends: Increasing demand for marketing data centralization and performance tracking.
- Value Proposition: Simplifies reporting by aggregating data from various sources into one platform, allowing for easier analysis and decision-making.
-
GrowthHackers
- Key Features: Experiment tracking, community-driven insights, growth-focused metrics, project management for marketing experiments.
- Trends: Focus on growth marketing through community engagement and collaborative problem solving.
- Value Proposition: Combines analytics with a community platform to foster collaboration and best practices in growth marketing, helping teams to optimize their performance through shared learning.
These competitors provide a variety of analytical and data integration features tailored to different business needs, along with growing trends in user experience and data privacy awareness.
