Top Airtable Alternatives & Competitors based on 734 Reviews
Reviews collected from
capterra.com
trustpilot.com
gartner.com
trustradius.com
softwareadvice.com
sitejabber.com
.
| Brand | Pricing |
|---|---|
|
★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ 3.3 |
Free plan available. Team costs $20 per seat/month with annual billing ($24 monthly); Business costs $45 per seat/month annually ($54 monthly); Enterprise Scale pricing is custom. |
|
★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ 3.3 |
|
|
★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ 4 |
Basecamp costs $15 per user/month. Pro Unlimited costs $299/month with annual billing or $349/month when billed monthly; a free trial is available. |
|
★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ 4.3 |
Free Forever plan available. Unlimited costs $7 per user/month and Business $12 per user/month with annual billing; Enterprise pricing is custom. |
|
|
|
|
★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ 4 |
Free plan available for up to 2 seats. Basic costs $9 per seat/month, Standard $12, and Pro $19 with annual billing; Enterprise pricing is custom. Paid plans may have seat minimums. |
|
★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ 3.8 |
Free plan available. Plus costs $10 per member/month and Business $20 per member/month with annual billing; Enterprise pricing is custom. |
|
★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ 3.2 |
Free plan available. Pro costs $9 per member/month and Business $19 per member/month with annual billing; Enterprise pricing is custom. |
|
★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ 3.5 |
Beginner plan is free. Pro costs $4 per month with annual billing ($5 monthly); Business costs $6 per user/month annually ($8 monthly). |
|
★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ 3.4 |
Free plan available. Standard costs $5 per user/month, Premium $10, and Enterprise starts at $17.50 per user/month with annual billing; Enterprise pricing can vary by team size. |
Compare your brand to your competitors
Why should you be looking for a Airtable alternative?
Users may seek Airtable alternatives for specialized features, simpler workflows, lower costs, or better support. Options include Asana, Basecamp, ClickUp, Microsoft To Do, Monday.com, Notion, Smartsheet, Todoist, and Trello. We’ll compare their features, pricing, and target users to help you find the right fit.
Quick Overview of Top Airtable Competitors
- Asana — Best Airtable Alternative for Structured Project Management: Organizes work into tasks, projects, timelines, and portfolios, with features such as task dependencies and workload views for coordinating team projects.
- Basecamp — Best Airtable Alternative for Team Communication: Combines to-do lists with message boards, schedules, file storage, and group chat, keeping project discussions and tasks together.
- ClickUp — Best Airtable Alternative for an All-in-One Workspace: Offers tasks, docs, goals, dashboards, and multiple project views in one platform, with extensive options for customizing workflows.
- Microsoft To Do — Simplest Airtable Alternative for Personal Tasks: Provides straightforward lists, reminders, due dates, and recurring tasks, with integration into Microsoft 365 apps such as Outlook.
- Monday.com — Best Airtable Alternative for Visual Workflows: Uses customizable boards, automations, dashboards, and multiple views to help teams track tasks and project progress.
- Notion — Best Airtable Alternative for Docs and Tasks Together: Combines notes, wikis, databases, and task boards in customizable pages, making it useful for teams that want project information alongside their tasks.
- Smartsheet — Best Airtable Alternative for Spreadsheet-Style Project Tracking: Offers a familiar grid interface alongside Gantt charts, dashboards, and automation for managing structured projects and work at scale.
- Todoist — Best Airtable Alternative for To-Do Lists: Focuses on quick task capture, due dates, recurring tasks, labels, and filters, with shared projects for collaborating on lists.
- Trello — Best Airtable Alternative for Kanban Boards: Makes work easy to track with cards and boards, plus features such as checklists, due dates, and automation through Butler.
Airtable Alternatives: Feature by Feature Comparison
| Product and feature page | Key features | How it compares with Airtable | Distinctive or superior benefits for users |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asana | • Projects and tasks with owners, due dates, subtasks, dependencies, and custom fields • List, board, calendar, and timeline views • Goals, portfolios, workload planning, and project reporting • Forms and rules to collect requests and automate routine work |
Asana is built around managing projects and coordinating work across teams; Airtable is built around customizable databases that can be shaped into project-management workflows. Both offer multiple views and automation, but Asana’s project structure and management tools are more ready to use without first designing a database. | Stronger for structured project execution at scale. Goals and portfolios help leaders connect team projects to company objectives, while workload tools help managers spot capacity issues. Dependencies and project-specific reporting are useful for teams that need to coordinate delivery across many related projects. |
| Basecamp | • To-do lists and schedules • Message boards, group chat (Campfire), and direct messages • Shared documents and files • Automatic check-ins for recurring status updates • Hill Charts for showing how work is progressing through uncertainty |
Basecamp puts team communication, files, and to-dos together in a straightforward project space. Airtable offers more structured records, customizable data relationships, and configurable workflows; Basecamp is less focused on building custom systems and more focused on keeping project coordination in one place. | Better for simple, centralized team communication. Message boards and chat keep discussions alongside project work, reducing the need to assemble a separate communication setup. Automatic check-ins can make recurring status collection easier, and Hill Charts give teams a distinctive way to discuss work that is still being figured out. |
| ClickUp | • Tasks, subtasks, dependencies, and custom fields • Multiple work views, including lists, boards, and timelines • Docs, whiteboards, goals, and dashboards • Time tracking and workload tools • Automations, integrations, and AI features |
ClickUp combines task management with documents, collaboration, reporting, and other work tools in a single workspace. Airtable is especially suited to organizing related information and building custom applications around it; ClickUp offers a broader, more immediately task-centered toolkit. | A strong all-in-one option for teams that want fewer separate work apps. Native task management, time tracking, goals, and dashboards can help teams plan and report on work without assembling each function from separate tools. Its many settings and features also suit teams that want to customize how they manage tasks. |
| Microsoft To Do | • Personal and shared task lists • “My Day” planning, with suggested tasks • Due dates, reminders, recurring tasks, and steps within tasks • Task sharing and cross-device access • Integration with Microsoft 365 tasks, including Outlook-related workflows |
Microsoft To Do is a lightweight task manager, not a broad project database or work-management platform like Airtable. It offers fewer options for custom data structures, dashboards, and multi-step team workflows, but it makes basic task capture and daily planning simpler. | Better for personal task planning, particularly in a Microsoft 365 workflow. “My Day” helps users focus on a short daily list, while reminders and recurring tasks support everyday follow-through. Users who primarily need to manage personal tasks or Outlook-connected work may find it quicker and less complex than building an Airtable base. |
| monday.com | • Visual boards with customizable columns and statuses • Multiple views for tracking work • Dashboards, forms, and automation • Workload and project-planning tools • Integrations and templates for different teams and processes |
Both monday.com and Airtable let teams customize fields, views, and workflows. monday.com presents work through visual boards and packaged work-management features; Airtable’s database structure is more central, which can suit teams building systems around linked records and varied data. | Better for quickly setting up visual, team-facing workflows. Boards make status and ownership easy to scan, while templates and forms help teams start common processes—such as collecting requests—without designing every component from scratch. Workload and dashboard features are useful for managers monitoring progress and team capacity. |
| Notion | • Pages for notes, documents, and internal knowledge • Wikis and shared workspaces • Databases with different views and connected pages • Project and task tracking within pages • AI features for working with and creating content |
Notion combines documents and knowledge management with flexible databases. Airtable is more database- and operational-workflow-focused; Notion is particularly suited to teams that want project information, reference material, and discussions to live together in a document-like workspace. | Better for knowledge-rich work and flexible documentation. Teams can put project plans, meeting notes, reference material, and task databases side by side, making it easier to preserve context rather than separating it from the work. Its page-first approach is especially helpful for creating wikis and living documentation. |
| Smartsheet | • Spreadsheet-style work management • Gantt charts, calendars, and card views • Forms, dashboards, and automated workflows • Resource and portfolio management features • Tools for project collaboration and reporting |
Smartsheet’s grid is familiar to users who manage work in spreadsheets, with added project-planning and reporting capabilities. Airtable also uses a grid, but centers on relational databases and customizable apps. Smartsheet is more oriented toward formal project and portfolio controls; Airtable is more flexible for designing data-driven workflows. | Better for spreadsheet-familiar project teams and portfolio-level oversight. Gantt planning, resource management, and portfolio tools support teams coordinating dependencies, capacity, and reporting across larger programs. The familiar grid can also lower the learning curve for users moving from spreadsheets. |
| Todoist | • Fast task capture, including natural-language entry • Projects, sections, labels, and priorities • Due dates, recurring tasks, and reminders • Filters for creating focused task lists • Shared projects, integrations, and productivity tracking |
Todoist focuses on capturing and completing tasks rather than managing complex datasets or building team applications. Airtable can support richer workflows and structured records, but Todoist is more direct for users who want a clean task list without configuring fields, views, or a database. | Better for fast, low-friction personal task management. Natural-language entry helps users add dated or recurring tasks quickly, while labels, priorities, and filters make it easy to create focused lists. It is a strong choice when the main goal is remembering and completing tasks, not coordinating a data-heavy process. |
| Trello | • Visual boards, lists, and cards for tracking work through stages • Card details for tasks, owners, due dates, and attachments • Butler automation for routine board actions • Power-Ups and integrations to extend boards • Additional views and templates for organizing work |
Trello’s core board-and-card model is simpler and more immediately visual than Airtable’s database-first approach. Airtable is better suited to connecting records and building custom data systems; Trello makes it easy to see work moving through a workflow, especially when a team thinks in Kanban stages. | Better for approachable visual task tracking. Teams can set up a board quickly and make progress visible with minimal configuration. Butler automation can reduce repetitive board maintenance, while Power-Ups let teams add capabilities as their needs grow. |
Compare your brand to your competitors
Integration Capabilities for each Airtable competitor
| Alternative | Supported Integrations | Compatibility Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Asana | Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive, Outlook, Gmail, Zoom, Jira, Salesforce, GitHub, Figma, Miro, Zapier | Strong overlap with Airtable for collaboration, cloud storage, and development tools. Some connections are provided by partners or automation services rather than built directly into Asana. |
| Basecamp | Google Drive, Dropbox, Slack, Zapier, Make, and integrations offered by partner apps | Compared with Airtable, Basecamp’s integration options are less extensive and often rely on third-party services. Check the Extras directory for the connection and setup method you need. |
| ClickUp | Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive, Box, Google Calendar, Outlook, Zoom, GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Jira, Salesforce, HubSpot, Zapier, Make | Broad overlap with Airtable across work management, storage, communication, and developer tools. ClickUp also emphasizes connections to other project-management and software-development platforms. |
| Microsoft To Do | Outlook and flagged email, Microsoft Planner, Microsoft 365; additional workflows can be built with Power Automate | More centered on Microsoft’s ecosystem than Airtable. Its listed integrations are narrower; Airtable offers broader connections to non-Microsoft services and app-automation platforms. |
| monday.com | Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Drive, Dropbox, Gmail, Outlook, Zoom, Jira, GitHub, Salesforce, HubSpot, Zapier, Make | Broad overlap with Airtable for team collaboration, file storage, and automation. monday.com also lists integrations for business apps such as CRM and sales tools. |
| Notion | Slack, Google Drive, GitHub, Jira, Asana, Trello, Figma, Miro, Zoom, Canva, Zapier, Make | Overlaps with Airtable on collaboration, design, development, and automation tools. Some connections embed or preview external content rather than synchronize task data. |
| Smartsheet | Microsoft Teams, Slack, Google Workspace, Jira, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Tableau, Power BI, Adobe, DocuSign, Dropbox, Box, Zoom | Strong overlap with Airtable for collaboration and cloud storage, with additional emphasis on enterprise systems, reporting, and document workflows. Availability may depend on the Smartsheet plan or connector. |
| Todoist | Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar, Gmail, Google Drive, Dropbox, Slack, Alexa, Zapier, IFTTT, Make, Toggl Track | Connects to many of the same productivity and automation services as Airtable, but its integrations are primarily focused on personal task capture, calendars, and reminders. |
| Trello | Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Drive, Dropbox, Google Calendar, Jira, Confluence, GitHub, Salesforce, Zapier | Broad overlap with Airtable on collaboration, file storage, and automation. Trello also connects closely with Atlassian products; many additional integrations are provided as Power-Ups. |
Integration availability and setup methods can vary. A listing may refer to a native connection, a marketplace app, or a third-party automation service such as Zapier or Make.
Pros and Cons of each Airtable Alternative
Airtable is strongest when work depends on structured records, linked tables, custom views, forms, and lightweight workflow automation. The alternatives below tend to be stronger in particular areas of task management, collaboration, or specialized project tracking.
| Alternative | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Asana | Strong task and project management, including dependencies, timelines, portfolios, and workload planning. Better suited to coordinating work across teams than building a custom record system. | Less suited to modeling linked data—such as customers, projects, and assets—as a flexible database. Custom fields and views are organized around tasks and projects. |
| Basecamp | Brings team discussions, announcements, to-dos, files, and schedules together in a straightforward project space. Useful for client collaboration and teams that want a simple shared workspace. | Offers fewer options for custom data structures, linked records, specialized views, and workflow automation than Airtable. Less suited to complex tracking systems. |
| ClickUp | Combines tasks, documents, goals, and multiple project views, with extensive task-management features such as dependencies and recurring work. Can consolidate several work-management tools. | Its breadth can require more setup and ongoing configuration. Although it supports custom fields and relationships, it is less focused on database-style record management than Airtable. |
| Microsoft To Do | Simple personal task lists, recurring reminders, and integration with Microsoft 365—especially useful for individuals already using Outlook and Microsoft services. | Designed for personal task management rather than shared workflows or structured team data. Lacks Airtable-style linked tables, custom forms, and multi-view project tracking. |
| Monday.com | Visual boards, dashboards, automations, and project-management features make it useful for coordinating team workflows and monitoring progress. | Its boards are centered on work tracking; complex linked datasets can be less natural to manage than in Airtable. Extensive board and workflow configuration may also be needed for specialized systems. |
| Notion | Combines documents, wikis, and databases, making it useful for teams that want knowledge and project information in one workspace. Pages and databases can be tailored to different uses. | Its flexibility can require teams to define and maintain their own structure. For operational workflows, Airtable generally offers more database-focused tools, including purpose-built forms, interfaces, and automation. |
| Smartsheet | Spreadsheet-style layout can suit teams familiar with grid-based project tracking. It also offers project-management features such as dependencies, reporting, and resource planning. | Its sheet-based model is less natural for managing highly connected record types than Airtable’s linked tables. It may be less suitable for building custom apps or varied data-entry experiences. |
| Todoist | Fast task capture, recurring tasks, reminders, and natural-language date entry make it effective for personal productivity and lightweight task lists. | Not intended for managing complex team projects or structured information. It lacks Airtable-style relational data, custom forms, and configurable workflow views. |
| Trello | Simple kanban boards make task status and handoffs easy to see. Cards, checklists, and Power-Ups suit lightweight team workflows. | Board-and-card organization can become limiting when work involves many related record types, detailed reporting, or complex automation. Airtable is better suited to those data-heavy workflows. |
Airtable vs Competitors: Traffic & Marketing Comparison
Traffic comparison
Among brands with traffic data, Asana has the highest latest reported traffic: about 10.0M in August 2026. Smartsheet follows at 5.35M in March 2026. Notion has the lowest latest reported figure, about 1.41M in November 2025. These figures are from different months, so they are not a fully like-for-like comparison. Airtable, Basecamp, Microsoft To Do and Todoist have no traffic data here.
Top-performing keywords
All listed keyword rankings are #1. Airtable leads across workflow, business software and app-building terms. Asana and Basecamp rank strongly for construction-management and project-software searches; ClickUp has one related building-project term. Monday.com and Notion show an AI-focused strategy, while Smartsheet’s listed wins are branded searches. Rankings indicate visibility, but the data does not show how much traffic each keyword generates.
Visibility and reach
Asana has the strongest measured reach by latest reported organic traffic. Smartsheet also stands out, with the second-highest latest figure and branded keyword wins. Keyword breadth is strongest for Airtable, though its traffic is missing; Basecamp and Asana are especially visible in construction, while Monday.com and Notion target AI. Traffic data is absent for four brands, so their visibility cannot be compared reliably.
Compare your brand to your competitors
Other “Airtable” Alternatives & Competitors that you can find for free
| Competitor | Key features | Value proposition |
|---|---|---|
| Coda | Docs and tables combined; formulas; buttons and automations; integrations | Build collaborative, custom workspaces where documents and structured data live together. |
| Baserow | No-code relational databases; multiple views; APIs; open-source and self-hosting options | Get an Airtable-like database with more control over hosting and data. |
| NocoDB | Spreadsheet-style interface for SQL databases; forms, views, APIs and permissions | Add a no-code interface to existing databases without moving the underlying data. |
| SeaTable | Relational tables; forms; automation; scripting; cloud and self-hosted plans | Manage structured information with flexible workflows and deployment choices. |
| Fibery | Custom workspaces; linked databases; documents; workflows; integrations | Connect teams, knowledge and processes in a configurable work-management platform. |
Category trends: More AI assistance, built-in automation, connected relational data, and options for self-hosting or greater data control.