Top Typeform Alternatives & Competitors based on 75 Reviews
Reviews collected from
trustpilot.com
capterra.com
softwareadvice.com
trustradius.com
.
| Brand | Pricing |
|---|---|
|
|
Free plan available; paid plans have historically started at about US$29/month, with higher tiers around US$59 and US$99/month and custom Enterprise pricing. I can’t verify the live page here, so treat these prices as indicative. |
|
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 |
|
|
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4.8 |
Free Starter plan, followed by Bronze, Silver, and Gold tiers; historically listed at roughly US$39, US$49, and US$129/month, with custom Enterprise pricing. I can’t verify the live page here, so treat these prices as indicative. |
|
★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ 2.9 |
A free Basic option is available, with paid individual and team plans priced according to tier and billing cadence. Individual plans have historically started around US$39/month with annual billing; team plans are typically priced per user. I can’t verify the live page here, so treat these prices as indicative. |
Compare your brand to your competitors
Why should you be looking for a Typeform alternative?
Users may seek a Typeform alternative for specific features, a simpler workflow, lower costs, or better support. Google Forms, Jotform, and SurveyMonkey are leading options. We’ll compare their features, pricing, and ideal users to help you find the right fit.
Quick Overview of Top Typeform Competitors
- Google Forms — Cheapest Typeform Alternative: A no-cost option for creating surveys, quizzes, and basic feedback forms. It works with Google Sheets for organizing responses and is a practical choice for teams already using Google Workspace.
- Jotform — Feature-Rich Typeform Competitor: Offers a large template library, conditional logic, payment collection, and a wide range of integrations. Its form-building tools suit workflows that need more than a conversational survey.
- SurveyMonkey — Best Typeform Alternative for Survey and Feedback Tools: Provides survey-focused features such as branching logic, response analysis, and question-bank options. It’s a strong fit for teams that need structured research and reporting.
Typeform Alternatives: Feature by Feature Comparison
Google Forms
| Feature | Benefit to users | Compared with Typeform |
|---|---|---|
| Simple form and quiz builder (Google Forms) | Create surveys, registrations, feedback forms, and quizzes without installing software. People with a Google account can use it at no cost for many personal use cases. | A strong choice when cost and straightforward setup matter more than a highly designed, conversational form experience. Typeform is more focused on presenting questions one at a time. |
| Google Sheets connection | Send responses to a spreadsheet for sorting, filtering, formulas, charts, or further analysis. Responses can also be reviewed in Forms. | Especially convenient for teams already working in Google Workspace. Typeform offers integrations and exports, but Forms’ direct connection to Sheets reduces setup for Google-centric workflows. |
| Live collaboration | Share a form with collaborators who can help build or edit it through Google Drive. | Useful for teams that already co-edit Google Docs and Sheets. Typeform also supports team workflows, but Google Forms fits naturally into existing Drive permissions and collaboration habits. |
| Quiz mode and automatic grading | Set correct answers, assign points, and provide feedback. Google Forms can grade many question types automatically, making it useful for training, classroom checks, and knowledge tests. | A standout option when assessment and scoring are central. Typeform can collect answers and support quiz-like experiences, but Google Forms’ built-in quiz tools are a direct, low-friction fit for education and basic assessments. |
| Sections and answer-based routing | Divide a form into sections and send respondents to different sections based on their answers. This can keep follow-up questions relevant. | A practical way to build simple branching forms. Typeform also offers logic and is often more suited to polished, conversational branching journeys; Google Forms can be preferable when basic routing is sufficient and simplicity is the priority. |
| Response summaries and charts | View response summaries and question-level charts without first setting up a separate reporting tool. | Convenient for quick, at-a-glance results. Typeform offers response reporting too, while Google Forms’ summaries are particularly handy for users who want a simple overview alongside their Google Sheets data. |
| File uploads and response validation | Collect uploaded files and use validation rules to guide or restrict answers, such as requiring a particular response format. | Helpful for applications, homework, and requests that need supporting documents. File uploads may require respondents to sign in to a Google account, so this is less suitable when anonymous or frictionless submission is essential. |
Jotform
| Feature | Benefit to users | Compared with Typeform |
|---|---|---|
| Large template library and drag-and-drop builder (Jotform) | Start from a template for common needs—such as registrations, applications, orders, and feedback—and adapt it with a visual editor. | Jotform is a strong fit when users want many ready-made starting points and extensive form-building options. Typeform is more distinctive for its conversational presentation and polished, one-question-at-a-time experience. |
| Widgets and configurable form elements | Add specialized elements—such as signatures, product lists, calculations, or other interactive components—to handle more than basic question-and-answer collection. | Jotform’s breadth of widgets can make it better suited to forms that act like small workflows or transactions. Typeform’s feature set is more centered on guided question flows. |
| Payment collection | Create order, donation, or registration forms and connect payment services supported by Jotform. The available gateways and features depend on the setup and plan. | A useful advantage when a form needs to support different payment providers or a more involved order flow. Typeform supports payment collection as well, but Jotform’s range of payment-related form components can suit more varied transaction workflows. |
| Conditional logic and calculations | Use rules to show or hide questions, change what respondents see, or calculate values based on answers. | Suits forms with detailed requirements, such as quotes, order forms, or applications with many possible paths. Typeform also supports logic; Jotform may be preferable when the form combines branching with calculations and other form components. |
| PDF documents and signatures | Turn submitted information into a formatted PDF and collect signatures through supported form elements and workflows. | Particularly useful for organizations that need a printable or shareable record after submission. Typeform is generally more focused on collecting answers and presenting results than on document-generation workflows. |
| Approvals and workflow automation | Route submissions for review, send notifications, and support approval processes using Jotform’s workflow tools. | Helpful when a form submission is only the start of an internal process—for example, an expense request or application review. Typeform can connect to other tools, while Jotform offers more form-centered workflow capabilities. |
| Mobile and offline data collection | Jotform’s mobile tools can support collecting information on phones and, in supported configurations, working where connectivity is limited. | A notable advantage for field teams, events, or on-site inspections where internet access may be unreliable. Typeform is mobile-friendly, but Jotform can be a better fit when mobile data collection needs to work as an operational tool. |
| Integrations and specialized options | Connect forms with business tools and configure use cases such as healthcare data collection, subject to eligible plans and required settings. | Jotform can be attractive when users need a broad set of add-ons or a specialized form workflow. Typeform also has integrations, but Jotform’s widgets and form-oriented tools provide more ways to extend the form itself. |
SurveyMonkey
| Feature | Benefit to users | Compared with Typeform |
|---|---|---|
| Survey templates and question guidance (SurveyMonkey product) | Use templates and established question formats to build surveys for feedback, research, employee experience, and other common goals. | A strong choice when users want help structuring a conventional survey. Typeform emphasizes the respondent’s conversational experience; SurveyMonkey is especially suited to designing and analyzing structured surveys. |
| Survey logic and question controls | Use supported logic to tailor the survey to respondents’ answers. Depending on the plan and survey setup, tools may include skip or display logic and other question controls. | Useful for longer research surveys that need more control over question flow. Typeform also supports logic and often makes branching feel more conversational; SurveyMonkey is a strong fit when survey structure and analysis are the priority. |
| SurveyMonkey Audience | Find respondents through SurveyMonkey’s audience services for research when an organization does not have its own respondent pool. Audience targeting and availability depend on the project. | A substantial advantage for teams that need to recruit survey participants, not just build a form. Typeform can collect responses from a user’s own audience, but SurveyMonkey’s panel services can help source respondents. |
| Analysis and reporting tools | Review results with tools for filtering and comparing responses; higher-tier offerings may provide more advanced analysis options. | Better suited to teams that need to do more than view a basic response summary. Typeform provides analytics, but SurveyMonkey’s research-oriented reporting can be a stronger fit for structured surveys and deeper response analysis. |
| Distribution options | Share surveys through available channels such as links, email, or other supported collectors, depending on the plan and setup. | Useful when a team needs to manage how a survey is distributed and track responses across collection methods. Typeform also supports sharing and integrations; SurveyMonkey’s collector tools are designed around survey distribution. |
| Benchmarks and research context | Where available, benchmark features can help organizations compare results with broader data and interpret findings in context. | Helpful when an organization wants to assess results against external reference points rather than viewing its own responses alone. This is a more research-oriented advantage than Typeform’s primary focus on form design and response collection. |
| Team and administration features | Team plans can support shared survey work and administrative controls for organizations managing multiple users or projects. | More suitable for organizations running ongoing survey programs across teams. Typeform also supports collaborative work, but SurveyMonkey’s organizational tools can be valuable when governance and survey management are central. |
Feature availability, limits, and integrations can vary by plan and may change over time.
Compare your brand to your competitors
Integration Capabilities for each Typeform competitor
| Alternative | Supported Integrations | Compatibility Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Google Forms | Google Sheets for response storage; Google Apps Script and the Google Forms API for custom workflows and connections. (Google Forms developer documentation) | The cited documentation describes developer tools, rather than a catalog of prebuilt third-party integrations. Sheets is the clearest native match to Typeform’s spreadsheet integrations; connecting other survey or feedback tools generally requires custom development or a separate automation service. |
| Jotform | Google Sheets, Salesforce, Mailchimp and other services through Jotform’s integrations; webhooks and the Jotform API for custom connections. (Jotform API and webhooks) | Prebuilt connections suit common CRM, email-marketing and spreadsheet workflows. The cited page focuses on API and webhook capabilities, so custom connections may require setup rather than working like a one-click integration. |
| SurveyMonkey | Microsoft Excel, Google Sheets, Tableau, Microsoft Power BI and other data-analysis connections highlighted in its article. (SurveyMonkey: integrations for analyzing data) | Particularly suited to exporting survey results for spreadsheet or business-intelligence analysis. Check each integration’s availability and plan requirements; the article focuses on data analysis rather than a complete integration directory. |
| Typeform (comparison point) | Google Sheets, Slack, HubSpot, Mailchimp, Salesforce, Zapier and other listed integrations. (Typeform integrations) | Typeform’s page provides a broader, prebuilt integration catalog. As with the alternatives, availability and setup can vary by integration and plan. |
Pros and Cons of each Typeform Alternative
| Alternative | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Google Forms | Free for many everyday uses; easy to create and share; responses feed directly into Google Sheets; works well with Google Workspace collaboration and basic quizzes or registrations. | Less control over visual branding and respondent experience than Typeform; branching and question logic are more limited; built-in analysis is basic, so deeper reporting often means using Sheets or another tool. |
| Jotform | Broad form-building toolkit, including templates, conditional logic, widgets, and payment options; useful for operational forms such as applications, orders, and registrations; offers more ways to customize a form’s fields and workflow. | The large set of options can make setup more involved; forms can feel more like conventional forms than Typeform’s conversational, one-question-at-a-time experience; submission and storage limits vary by plan. |
| SurveyMonkey | Strong fit for surveys that need structured analysis, with features such as question banks, survey logic, and reporting tools; paid offerings may include access to respondent panels for collecting answers from targeted audiences. | Some analysis, distribution, and response-management features depend on the plan; its survey-focused approach may be less suited to building customized operational forms; it offers a different respondent experience from Typeform’s conversational format. |
Plan limits and feature availability can change, so check each provider’s current plan details before choosing.
Typeform vs Competitors: Traffic & Marketing Comparison
Traffic Comparison: Organic traffic data is empty for all four brands, so their traffic volumes cannot be compared or ranked. The available data does not establish which brand attracts the most or least organic visitors.
Top Performing Keywords: Typeform has eight listed keywords, all ranked #1, including “workflow tools” and “email automation.” Google Forms has 12 #1 terms, mostly Google-, Gmail-, and email-related. No keyword data is listed for JotForm or SurveyMonkey. The terms suggest different visibility themes, but traffic contribution is not provided.
Visibility and Reach: By the supplied keyword data, Google Forms has the broadest listed reach (12 terms), followed by Typeform (8); both have #1 rankings for every listed term. JotForm and SurveyMonkey have no rankings shown. These results indicate keyword visibility only—not overall reach or traffic, which cannot be assessed without traffic data.
Compare your brand to your competitors
Other “Typeform” Alternatives & Competitors that you can find for free
| Competitor | Key features | Trends | Value proposition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tally | No-code forms, conditional logic, calculations, file uploads, and integrations | Simple, lightweight form building with a generous free tier | Create polished forms quickly without a steep learning curve or high upfront cost |
| Fillout | Custom layouts, logic, payments, scheduling, and integrations with tools such as Airtable | Forms are increasingly connected to databases and business workflows | Build flexible forms that feed directly into the tools teams already use |
| Paperform | Branded forms, payment collection, bookings, product sales, and automation | Forms are expanding into landing pages and checkout experiences | Turn a form into a polished, all-in-one way to collect information and payments |
| SurveySparrow | Conversational surveys, logic, reporting, and multiple distribution channels | More interactive surveys and feedback collection across channels | Make surveys feel more engaging while bringing feedback into one platform |
| Zoho Forms | Form creation, approvals, workflows, integrations, and mobile data collection | Greater emphasis on automation and connected business software | A practical choice for organizations already using Zoho, with forms tied to wider business processes |