Top SurveyMonkey Alternatives & Competitors based on 75 Reviews
Reviews collected from
capterra.com
trustpilot.com
trustradius.com
softwareadvice.com
.
| Brand | Pricing |
|---|---|
|
★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ 2.9 |
Offers a free Basic plan, individual Advantage (about $39/month) and Premier (about $139/month) plans, plus Team Advantage (about $25/user/month) and Team Premier (about $75/user/month). Paid prices are generally shown with annual billing; Enterprise pricing is custom. |
|
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 |
|
|
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4.8 |
Has a free Starter plan and paid Bronze, Silver, and Gold plans, typically listed at about $39, $49, and $129 per month, respectively. Annual billing may lower the monthly equivalent; Enterprise pricing is custom. |
|
|
Offers a free plan and Basic, Plus, and Business plans, typically around $29, $59, and $99 per month, respectively. Annual billing may reduce the monthly equivalent; Enterprise pricing is custom. |
Compare your brand to your competitors
Why should you be looking for a SurveyMonkey alternative?
Users may seek SurveyMonkey alternatives for specialized features, a simpler workflow, lower costs, or more responsive support. Google Forms, Jotform, and Typeform are top options. We’ll compare their features, pricing, and ideal users to help you find the right fit.
Quick Overview of Top SurveyMonkey Competitors
- Google Forms — Cheapest SurveyMonkey Alternative: A free, straightforward option for creating surveys and collecting responses. It connects easily with Google Sheets and supports answer-based branching, though it offers fewer advanced analysis and design options than SurveyMonkey.
- Jotform — Best SurveyMonkey Competitor for Form Flexibility: Offers a drag-and-drop builder, a large template library, conditional logic, and payment collection. Its broad integrations make it useful for teams that want surveys alongside other form workflows.
- Typeform — Best SurveyMonkey Alternative for Conversational Surveys: Uses a one-question-at-a-time format and supports branching logic for a more guided survey experience. Its polished presentation is a strength, though some features and response limits depend on the plan.
SurveyMonkey Alternatives: Feature by Feature Comparison
| Platform and feature | Specific user benefit | Compared with SurveyMonkey |
|---|---|---|
| Google Forms — Free, straightforward form creation (Google Forms) | Users with a Google account can create surveys, quizzes, and registration forms without buying a separate survey subscription. Templates and familiar Google controls help teams get a basic form live quickly. | Standout advantage: a low-cost, low-friction option for everyday forms, especially for individuals and teams already using Google Workspace. SurveyMonkey offers a broader set of research and survey-management features, but some capabilities depend on the plan. |
| Google Forms — Google Sheets connection and response summaries | Responses can be viewed in Forms or sent to Google Sheets for sorting, filtering, calculations, and further analysis. Built-in charts make it easy to review basic results without setting up a separate reporting tool. | Standout advantage: a direct fit for teams that already analyze information in Sheets. SurveyMonkey provides dedicated survey-analysis tools, while Forms is especially convenient when users want their results in the Google ecosystem. |
| Google Forms — Real-time collaboration | Multiple collaborators can edit a form, and teams can share access using Google Drive permissions. This is useful for jointly drafting questions or coordinating internal feedback collection. | Standout advantage: familiar, simple collaboration for Google Workspace teams. SurveyMonkey also supports team use, but Forms can be easier when collaborators already work in Drive. |
| Google Forms — Branching, validation, and quizzes | Users can send respondents to different sections based on answers, set response validation, and mark quiz answers for automatic scoring. These tools help keep forms relevant and reduce invalid or incomplete responses. | SurveyMonkey offers more extensive survey logic and research features on eligible plans. Google Forms is a practical choice when users need straightforward branching, validation, or classroom-style quizzes without a complex setup. |
| Google Forms — Simple sharing and embedding | Forms can be shared by link or embedded on a website, making them easy to distribute for event sign-ups, internal polls, and basic feedback collection. | Similar distribution options are available in SurveyMonkey. Forms’ advantage is the simplicity of sharing within Google tools; SurveyMonkey is better suited when users need more specialized survey distribution and audience-management options. |
| Jotform — Drag-and-drop builder and large template library (Jotform) | Users can build forms by arranging fields visually, or start from templates for common needs such as registrations, applications, feedback, and orders. This reduces setup time and makes it easier to create forms for specific workflows. | Standout advantage: the combination of a visual builder and broad range of ready-made form templates makes Jotform particularly flexible for operational forms. SurveyMonkey is more centered on surveys and structured feedback collection. |
| Jotform — Conditional logic and calculated fields | Forms can show or hide questions, route users to different paths, and perform calculations based on responses. This helps personalize applications, order forms, and intake forms while avoiding irrelevant questions. | Both platforms support logic, with availability and depth depending on plan. Jotform’s form-building focus makes it useful when logic needs to support a broader transaction or workflow—not just a survey. |
| Jotform — Payment collection | Users can add payment fields and connect supported payment processors to collect fees, donations, or order payments in a form. This lets organizations combine information gathering and payment in one flow. | Standout advantage: Jotform is well suited to forms that need to handle payments as part of the submission process. SurveyMonkey also offers payment-related capabilities in some contexts and plans, but Jotform’s wider form-and-order use cases are a key differentiator. |
| Jotform — Integrations and workflow automation | Connections to other apps can pass submission data into tools used for email, customer management, storage, and team operations. This reduces manual copying and helps form submissions trigger follow-up tasks. | Jotform is useful when a form is one step in a larger business process. SurveyMonkey also integrates with other services, particularly for survey and feedback workflows; check each platform’s integrations and plan limits for the tools a team uses. |
| Jotform — Approvals, e-signatures, and document workflows | Teams can use submissions to support approval processes and collect signatures or other required information. This can simplify requests such as expense approvals, consent forms, and internal applications. | Standout advantage: Jotform can support end-to-end form workflows beyond collecting opinions. SurveyMonkey is more purpose-built for gathering and analyzing feedback than for managing operational approvals. |
| Jotform — PDF and mobile tools | Users can turn submissions into PDFs and build forms intended for mobile completion or field use. This is helpful when teams need a record of each submission or collect information away from a desk. | Jotform’s PDF and mobile-oriented tools are useful for paperwork-like processes. SurveyMonkey’s core strength is survey distribution and analysis rather than turning form submissions into operational documents. |
| Jotform — Security options for sensitive forms | Jotform provides security-related controls and offers HIPAA-compliant capabilities on eligible plans, subject to the required configuration and agreement. This can help organizations assess whether it fits forms containing sensitive information. | Standout advantage: Jotform offers options aimed at regulated or sensitive-data workflows. Organizations should verify plan requirements and compliance obligations with either vendor before collecting protected information. |
| Typeform — Conversational, one-question-at-a-time format (Typeform) | Respondents see questions in a sequential, conversational flow rather than a long page of fields. This can make a survey or lead form feel more focused, especially on mobile devices. | Standout advantage: Typeform’s signature experience emphasizes presentation and respondent engagement. SurveyMonkey is often a better fit when users prioritize traditional survey tools, research controls, and analysis over a conversational interface. |
| Typeform — Personalized paths and answer recall | Logic can tailor the next question to a respondent’s answers, while earlier answers can be reused in later questions. This makes forms feel more relevant and can avoid asking people to repeat information. | Both platforms offer logic features, with specifics varying by plan. Typeform’s format makes tailored question flows especially visible to respondents; SurveyMonkey provides a more survey-oriented set of logic and analysis capabilities. |
| Typeform — Visual design and media | Users can create branded forms with a polished presentation and incorporate visual elements or media where supported. This can help make customer-facing surveys, quizzes, and lead forms feel consistent with a brand. | Standout advantage: Typeform is particularly suited to teams that treat the form experience as part of their brand. SurveyMonkey offers customization options too, but Typeform’s conversational visual style is its defining difference. |
| Typeform — Embeds and integrations for lead capture | Forms can be embedded in digital experiences and connected to other tools, helping teams collect leads or feedback where people already interact with their brand. | Typeform is a strong choice for customer-facing lead-generation flows and polished embedded forms. SurveyMonkey offers broader survey distribution and research-oriented options; the best fit depends on whether the priority is a branded interaction or a more comprehensive survey program. |
| Typeform — Response reporting and analysis | Users can review submitted responses and use connected tools to support follow-up or analysis. This is useful for teams tracking lead responses, customer feedback, or quiz results. | SurveyMonkey is generally the stronger fit for teams that need dedicated survey analysis and research features. Typeform’s main differentiator is the respondent experience; teams with advanced reporting requirements should compare the specific analytics available on each plan. |
Feature availability, response limits, integrations, and compliance options can vary by plan and may change over time.
Compare your brand to your competitors
Integration Capabilities for each SurveyMonkey competitor
| Alternative | Supported Integrations | Compatibility Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Google Forms | Google Sheets; Google Forms API; Apps Script. Other connections—such as Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, and Mailchimp—are generally made through automation tools or custom code. | Strongest for Google Sheets workflows. The Forms API provides building blocks for custom connections, rather than a catalogue of ready-made third-party integrations. For SurveyMonkey-style Excel or BI analysis, data may need to pass through Sheets, an export, or a custom connector. |
| Jotform | API and webhooks for custom integrations; integrations commonly include Google Sheets, Slack, Salesforce, HubSpot, Mailchimp, and Dropbox, with automation-platform options such as Zapier. | Webhooks and the API support sending form data to other systems. They can connect Jotform to analytics or CRM workflows, but typically require setup; check Jotform’s integration directory and plan for availability. |
| Typeform | Google Sheets, Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Mailchimp, and Airtable; automation options include Zapier and Make. | Offers ready-made connections for common feedback, CRM, and productivity workflows. For deeper reporting in tools such as Tableau or Power BI, data may require an automation platform, export, or API connection. |
SurveyMonkey’s comparison point is its article’s analytics-oriented integrations, including spreadsheet and BI workflows such as Excel, Google Sheets, Power BI, and Tableau. Integration availability and features can vary by product plan.
Pros and Cons of each SurveyMonkey Alternative
| Alternative | Pros compared with SurveyMonkey | Cons compared with SurveyMonkey |
|---|---|---|
| Google Forms | Core form and quiz creation is available at no cost for personal Google accounts. Responses connect directly to Google Sheets, and forms are easy to share and collaborate on within Google Workspace. | Offers less depth for advanced survey logic, analysis and reporting. It has fewer specialized survey-distribution options, such as access to respondent panels, and less flexibility for branding and enterprise survey management. |
| Jotform | Better suited to forms that need to do more than collect survey answers: its form-building tools include payment integrations, widgets and workflow features. It also offers a broad template library and conditional logic. | Submission limits and feature availability depend on the plan. Its broad form toolkit can require more setup, while SurveyMonkey is more focused on survey analysis, distribution and respondent-panel services. |
| Typeform | Uses a conversational, one-question-at-a-time format that can work well for interactive feedback and lead-capture forms. It offers visual customization, conditional paths and integrations. | Usage limits and pricing depend on the plan. The format may be less suitable for long or grid-heavy questionnaires, and SurveyMonkey offers more survey-focused reporting and distribution options, including respondent panels. |
Plan features, limits and pricing change over time, so check each provider’s current plan details before choosing.
SurveyMonkey vs Competitors: Traffic & Marketing Comparison
Traffic comparison: Organic-traffic data is empty for all four brands, so their traffic cannot be compared or ranked. The dataset does not identify a highest- or lowest-traffic brand; any such conclusion would be unsupported. Traffic figures over a consistent period would be needed to assess which brand attracts more organic visitors.
Top-performing keywords: Google Forms has 12 listed keywords, including “google sign in,” “google login,” and “google gmail.” Typeform has eight, focused on marketing and workflow topics, such as “email automation” and “ai marketing tool.” SurveyMonkey and JotForm have no keywords listed. These entries suggest different topic coverage, but without search volume, clicks, or confirmed ranking positions, they cannot be said to drive traffic.
Visibility and reach: Google Forms shows the broadest listed keyword reach, while Typeform has a narrower cluster around marketing, AI, and workflows. This suggests potential visibility in distinct niches, not proven overall superiority. SurveyMonkey and JotForm have no keyword data here, and no brand has traffic data, so overall visibility and reach cannot be reliably ranked.
Compare your brand to your competitors
Other “SurveyMonkey” Alternatives & Competitors that you can find for free
| Competitor | Key features | Trend emphasis | Value proposition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qualtrics | Advanced survey logic, experience-management tools, analytics, integrations, and enterprise controls | Linking customer and employee feedback to broader experience analytics | Deep research and analytics capabilities for organizations with complex feedback programs |
| SurveySparrow | Conversational surveys, recurring surveys, NPS tools, multilingual support, and workflow integrations | More conversational, multi-channel feedback collection | Helps make surveys feel more engaging while supporting ongoing feedback programs |
| Zoho Survey | Survey templates, branching, multilingual surveys, reporting, and integrations with Zoho apps | Connecting survey feedback with CRM and business workflows | A practical option for teams already using Zoho, with a broad feature set at accessible price points |
| Alchemer | Flexible question logic, APIs, integrations, reporting, and feedback workflows | Turning survey responses into follow-up actions across business systems | Offers customization and workflow control for teams that need more flexibility than basic form tools |
| LimeSurvey | Open-source and hosted options, advanced question types, multilingual surveys, and self-hosting | Greater emphasis on data control, privacy, and deployment flexibility | Suits organizations that want extensive customization or control over where survey data is hosted |