Top Intercom Alternatives & Competitors based on 695 Reviews
Reviews collected from
trustpilot.com
softwareadvice.com
gartner.com
capterra.com
sitejabber.com
trustradius.com
facebook.com
reviews.io
.
| Brand | Pricing |
|---|---|
|
☆ ☆ |
Intercom offers four main pricing tiers: ‘Starter’ at $74/month (billed annually), ‘Essentials’ at $187/month (billed annually), ‘Pro’ at $470/month, and ‘Build’ with custom pricing. Prices vary based on the features and usage, including messaging and customer engagement tools. |
|
☆ ☆ |
Crisp has three pricing plans: ‘Free’, which offers basic features; ‘Pro’ at €25/month (billed annually), providing advanced features; and ‘Unlimited’ at €95/month (billed annually), which includes all features and priority support. |
|
☆ ☆ |
Drift provides a free plan for basic features and three paid plans: ‘Pro’ starting from $400/month, ‘Advanced’ starting from $1,000/month, and ‘Enterprise’ with custom pricing. Plans include various features related to conversational marketing and sales. |
|
☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
|
|
☆ |
LiveChat has three pricing plans: ‘Starter’ at $19/agent/month, ‘Team’ at $39/agent/month, and ‘Business’ at $59/agent/month. Each plan adds more features and capabilities for customer engagement. |
|
☆ ☆ ☆ |
Zendesk offers several pricing options for its support products: ‘Essential’ starting at $5/agent/month, ‘Team’ at $19/agent/month, ‘Professional’ at $49/agent/month, and ‘Enterprise’ at $99/agent/month. Each tier includes different levels of support features. |
Compare your brand to your competitors
Why should you be looking for a Intercom alternative?
Users often seek alternatives to Intercom due to specific feature needs, budget constraints, ease of use, and varying support options. Businesses may require more intuitive interfaces, better pricing plans, or different functionalities to suit their customer engagement strategies. Top alternatives include Crisp, Drift, Freshdesk, LiveChat, and Zendesk. Each offers distinct features, pricing structures, and target user demographics, which will be explored to help you make an informed decision that fits your business’s unique requirements.
Quick Overview of Top Intercom Competitors
-
Crisp – Best Budget-Friendly Intercom Alternative
Crisp offers a free version with robust features, including live chat, chatbot, and email support. Its unified inbox consolidates customer interactions across various channels, making it a cost-effective choice for startups and small businesses looking for an affordable alternative to Intercom. -
Drift – Top Intercom Competitor for Conversational Marketing
Drift specializes in conversational marketing and real-time chat, allowing businesses to engage customers proactively. Its unique features like chatbots designed for lead generation and meeting scheduling distinguish it from Intercom, making it ideal for marketing teams focused on sales conversion. -
Freshdesk – Comprehensive Intercom Alternative for Multi-Channel Support
Freshdesk provides extensive multi-channel support including email, phone, chat, and social media. Its robust ticketing system and automation capabilities enhance team efficiency, making it an excellent Intercom competitor for organizations that require a more structured support solution. -
LiveChat – User-Friendly Intercom Alternative for Instant Messaging
LiveChat excels in providing a user-friendly interface and customizable chat features. Its seamless integration with various eCommerce platforms and insightful analytics sets it apart, making it a preferred option for businesses prioritizing real-time customer engagement similar to Intercom. -
Zendesk – Leading Intercom Competitor for Enterprise Solutions
Zendesk is a powerful platform suitable for larger organizations, offering extensive customization, reporting tools, and a wide range of integrations. Its scalability and advanced support features surpass those of Intercom, making it a strong alternative for businesses with complex customer support needs.
Intercom Alternatives: Feature by Feature Comparison
| Feature | Crisp | Drift | Freshdesk | LiveChat | Zendesk | Intercom |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Live Chat | User-friendly chat with a personalized touch, customizable design, and a powerful message integration system. | Advanced chat functionalities with a focus on real-time engagement; offers AI-based features for instant responses. | Integrated live chat as part of a broader customer support suite, compatible with email and phone. | Versatile live chat that provides real-time communication and customization to fit brand identity. | Comprehensive live chat solutions included in a robust ticketing system with advanced analytics. | Fully-featured live chat with automated responses, but less focused on real-time sales engagement. |
| Chatbot | Easy-to-set-up chatbots that handle FAQs and lead qualification effectively. | High-quality conversational AI to streamline lead engagement and scheduling meetings. | Integrated AI-powered chatbots for 24/7 support and automated responses to common inquiries. | Offers basic AI chatbots for answering FAQs but less sophisticated than Drift’s chatbot capabilities. | Boasts advanced AI chatbots that improve customer engagement with contextual understanding. | Provides chatbot functionalities but may require more manual setup for effective use. |
| Integrations | Supports various integrations including CRMs and web services, but fewer out-of-the-box options than others. | Dynamic integrations with leading CRM and marketing tools, particularly for sales funnels. | Extensive integrations with over 50+ apps and services, making it highly flexible for users seeking connectivity. | Solid integrations available, focused mostly on e-commerce platforms and digital marketing services. | Extensive marketplace with thousands of integrations, providing a very adaptable environment for diverse businesses. | Integrated approaches with various tools, though might not be as seamless as Freshdesk’s options. |
| User Experience | Clean and simple interface that’s easy for users to navigate, with an emphasis on aesthetics. | Modern, sleek interface tailored for ease of use and optimized for conversion. | Functional layout but can be overwhelming with a lot of features; better suited for high-volume support teams. | A user-friendly and clean interface aimed at straightforward customer interactions. | Intuitive interface but can be complex due to a range of features, which might require onboarding. | A streamlined interface designed to be quick to adapt but can be cluttered for new users. |
| Knowledge Base | Offers a built-in knowledge base feature that can be populated easily by team members. | Lacks a dedicated knowledge base, focusing instead on real-time conversations. | Robust knowledge base integration allows users to create and maintain support documents easily. | Provides a knowledge base feature, but it is not as comprehensive as Freshdesk’s. | Offers an advanced knowledge base with intuitive search functions, enhancing user self-service capabilities. | Has a knowledge base feature, though users often cite Freshdesk’s as more user-friendly. |
| Mobile Support | Mobile app available that supports chat functionalities for on-the-go management. | Mobile-optimized platform but with more emphasis on desktop applications. | Mobile app available, although features are primarily focused on ticket management. | Has a mobile app for managing conversations but not as developed as others. | Comprehensive mobile application that enables support teams to manage tickets and chats effectively. | Mobile app available, allows for somewhat limited functionality compared to desktop. |
| Pricing | Competitive pricing with a flexible freemium model to attract startups and small businesses. | Unique pricing model centered on usage and user engagement, potentially more expensive at scale. | Free tier available and competitive pricing, particularly appealing for small to medium enterprises. | Offers a range of pricing plans for varying business sizes, but the cost can add up quickly. | A diverse pricing structure, often seen as higher than competitors but justified by extensive features. | Pricing can become costly as more features are added, especially for larger teams. |
| Analytics & Reporting | Basic analytics tools available to track performance and user engagement. | Advanced analytics focused on conversation metrics and sales conversion rates. | Comprehensive reporting tools with in-depth analytics for measuring customer interactions and satisfaction. | Provides essential reporting features that allow tracking of chat volume and performance. | In-depth analytics and reporting capabilities, allowing organizations to track resolutions and customer satisfaction in detail. | Good reporting tools but less customizable compared to Freshdesk’s in-depth functionality. |
| Customer Segmentation | Offers basic segmentation features focused on user behavior. | Excellent segmentation capabilities allowing highly targeted marketing and sales efforts. | Some segmentation features but may not be as sophisticated as Drift’s. | Basic segmentation options are available, though not as advanced as Drift’s. | Advanced customer segmentation tools for personalized support and engagement strategies. | Offers segmentation capabilities but lacks the depth found in Drift’s approach. |
Conclusion: The comparison shows that while each platform has its strengths, Crisp stands out for its user-friendly interface and freemium pricing, Drift excels with its real-time engagement features, Freshdesk is excellent for comprehensive customer support, LiveChat provides versatile chat solutions, and Zendesk is known for its robust analytics and reporting prowess. Intercom remains a strong contender but may lack some specialized features found in its competitors.
Compare your brand to your competitors
Integration Capabilities for each Intercom competitor
| Alternative | Supported Integrations | Compatibility Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Intercom | Slack, Salesforce, HubSpot, Shopify, Zapier, WordPress, Microsoft Teams | Extensive integrations with CRM, eCommerce, and CMS tools. |
| Crisp | Zapier, WordPress, Shopify, Stripe, Slack, Airtable, Mailchimp | Good compatibility with eCommerce and marketing tools. |
| Drift | Salesforce, HubSpot, Marketo, Zapier, Google Analytics, Slack, Calendly | Focused on CRM and marketing automation integrations. |
| Freshdesk | Slack, Salesforce, Zapier, HubSpot, Microsoft Teams, Trello, GitHub | Strong integrations with project management and CRM tools. |
| LiveChat | Zapier, Salesforce, WordPress, Shopify, Mailchimp, HubSpot, Google Analytics | Emphasizes eCommerce and marketing tool compatibility. |
| Zendesk | Slack, Salesforce, HubSpot, Microsoft Teams, Google Analytics, Jira, Shopify | Comprehensive integration with a variety of business tools. |
Pros and Cons of each Intercom Alternative
Here’s a table summarizing the primary pros and cons of each alternative compared to Intercom:
| Alternative | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Crisp | – Affordable pricing model for startups and small businesses. | – Limited features compared to more established solutions like Intercom. |
| – Easy to set up and user-friendly interface. | – Some users report performance issues during peak times. | |
| – Offers a free plan with useful features. | – Integration options are not as extensive. | |
| Drift | – Focus on conversational marketing and lead generation. | – Can become expensive as you scale. |
| – Features targeted at sales teams, including meeting scheduling. | – Learning curve for full feature utilization. | |
| – Strong analytics and reporting capabilities. | – Limited multi-channel support compared to Intercom. | |
| Freshdesk | – Comprehensive helpdesk features with ticketing system. | – Chat features may not be as advanced as Intercom’s. |
| – Cost-effective for teams looking for an all-in-one customer support solution. | – Interface can be cluttered and overwhelming for new users. | |
| – Strong automation capabilities for reducing manual tasks. | – Integration with some third-party services may lack depth. | |
| LiveChat | – Rich customization options for chat widgets. | – Less focus on comprehensive customer engagement tools as compared to Intercom. |
| – Strong reporting and analytics functionalities. | – Higher pricing for advanced features. | |
| – Intuitive user experience for both agents and customers. | – Limited CRM capabilities; functions mainly as a chat solution. | |
| Zendesk | – Extensive suite of customer service tools beyond just chat (ticketing, support). | – Can be more complex to set up and manage than Intercom. |
| – Strong integration capabilities with various apps and platforms. | – Pricing can be on the higher side for small businesses. | |
| – Scalability for larger organizations with diverse needs. | – Chat interface may feel less modern compared to Intercom. |
This table highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each alternative relevant to typical use cases, providing a concise overview for easier comparison with Intercom.
Intercom vs Competitors: Traffic & Marketing Comparison
Traffic Comparison:
In March 2025, the organic traffic for the brands showcased significant variance. Zendesk leads with approximately 23.7 million visits, followed by LiveChat at around 10.2 million. Freshdesk also performs well with about 2.7 million. Intercom and Drift trail behind, with traffic counts of around 479,565 and 102,679, respectively, while Crisp remains the lowest, attracting roughly 165,743 visits. This stark difference illustrates Zendesk and LiveChat’s commanding internet presence compared to smaller competitors like Crisp and Drift.
Top Performing Keywords:
For Intercom, high-ranking keywords include "customer service" and "live chat platforms," indicating a strong focus on customer interaction. Freshdesk shares similar strengths with keywords like "help desk software" and "customer support." In contrast, Drift excels in sales-related keywords, securing the top spots for "sales automation" and "sales software." Crisp, while strong in customer support terms, has varied rankings across messaging platforms. This reflects a diverse keyword strategy among brands, catering to their respective target audiences.
Conclusions on Visibility and Reach:
Based on organic traffic and keyword reach, Zendesk demonstrates the strongest online visibility, dominating with both traffic and keyword rankings, particularly in customer support services. LiveChat also boasts impressive metrics but lacks the keyword diversity seen in Freshdesk. Intercom, while strong in customer engagement keywords, has lower traffic, suggesting potential for growth. Drift’s sales-focused keywords position it uniquely in its niche, but it needs to enhance overall traffic to compete robustly against the leading brands.
Compare your brand to your competitors
Other “Intercom” Alternatives & Competitors that you can find for free
Sure! Here are five alternatives and competitors to Intercom, along with their key features, strengths, and value propositions:
-
HubSpot Service Hub
- Key Features: Ticketing system, customer feedback tools, knowledge base, live chat, and integration with CRM.
- Strengths: Comprehensive integration with HubSpot CRM, user-friendly interface, and strong automation capabilities.
- Value Proposition: Provides a complete customer service solution that aligns with marketing and sales functionalities, enabling seamless customer relationship management.
-
Olark
- Key Features: Real-time chat, chat transcripts, visitor insights, automation, and integrations with various CRM and email marketing tools.
- Strengths: Simple setup, excellent customer support, and features like visitor tracking and proactive chat prompts.
- Value Proposition: Affordable live chat solution that enhances customer interaction while providing valuable insights into visitor behavior.
-
HelpCrunch
- Key Features: Live chat, email automation, in-app messaging, customer support ticketing, and a knowledge base.
- Strengths: Great for startups and small to medium-sized businesses, with robust onboarding processes and customization options.
- Value Proposition: An all-in-one customer communication platform designed to enhance engagement and improve customer experience across channels.
-
Tidio
- Key Features: Live chat, chatbots, email integration, visitor tracking, and mobile app.
- Strengths: User-friendly interface, easy integration with various e-commerce platforms, and powerful automation capabilities.
- Value Proposition: Combines live chat and chatbot functionality to deliver immediate customer support while saving time through automation.
-
Zoho Desk
- Key Features: Multi-channel support (email, chat, phone), knowledge base, automation workflows, reporting, and integration with Zoho CRM.
- Strengths: Affordable pricing, extensive customization options, and strong automation features.
- Value Proposition: A flexible help desk solution that empowers teams to deliver exceptional customer service through multi-channel support and effective ticket management.
These competitors provide diverse features and value propositions tailored to various business needs and sizes, ensuring a range of options beyond Intercom.
