Top Make Alternatives & Competitors based on 87 Reviews
Reviews collected from
capterra.com
trustpilot.com
softwareadvice.com
trustradius.com
sitejabber.com
.
| Brand | Pricing |
|---|---|
|
☆ ☆ |
Make offers four pricing tiers: Free, Basic, Standard, and Pro. The Free plan includes 1,000 operations and 1 active scenario. The Basic plan starts at $9/month with 10,000 operations and up to 3 active scenarios. The Standard plan is priced at $29/month for 100,000 operations and 5 active scenarios, while the Pro plan costs $99/month, covering 1,000,000 operations and unlimited scenarios. |
|
☆ ☆ |
Zapier provides five pricing plans: Free, Starter, Professional, Team, and Company. The Free plan allows for 5 Zaps and 100 tasks per month. The Starter plan is $19.99/month, offering 20 Zaps and 750 tasks, while the Professional plan is $49/month, providing unlimited Zaps and 2,000 tasks. The Team plan is priced at $299/month, accommodating collaboration with advanced admin features, and the Company plan starts at $599/month, ideal for larger organizations with enhanced security and support. |
Compare your brand to your competitors
Why should you be looking for a Make alternative?
Users may seek alternatives to "Make" for various reasons, including specific feature needs, ease of use, budget constraints, and the availability of support options. Many users prioritize intuitive interfaces, seamless integrations, and cost-effectiveness. "Zapier" emerges as a top alternative, offering robust automation features, diverse pricing tiers, and a focus on business users. This exploration will delve into each platform’s key features, pricing structures, and suitability for different target users to help you make an informed choice.
Quick Overview of Top Make Competitors
-
Zapier – Best "Make" Alternative for User-Friendliness
Zapier is renowned for its easy-to-use interface and extensive library of over 3,000 apps. It simplifies automation with its no-code functionality, allowing even non-technical users to create workflows effortlessly. -
Integromat – Best "Make" Alternative for Advanced Users
Integromat offers robust automation capabilities with a visual flow builder that supports complex scenarios. Advanced users can utilize its HTTP/SOAP and JSON modules for deeper integrations, setting it apart from Make’s simpler approach. -
Automate.io – Cheapest Make Alternative
Automate.io offers a competitive pricing model with similar features, allowing users to create multi-app workflows affordably. It supports over 200 apps and provides pre-built templates for quick automation setup. -
Microsoft Power Automate – Strong "Make" Competitor for Enterprises
Microsoft Power Automate integrates seamlessly with Microsoft products and is designed for large organizations. Its powerful automation features and AI builder make it ideal for enterprise-scale automation needs, positioning it as a formidable Make competitor. -
n8n – Best Open-Source Make Alternative
n8n is an open-source automation tool that allows users to self-host their workflows. It caters to developers by offering flexibility and customization options that are limited in Make, all while being free to use. -
Pipedream – Best "Make" Alternative for Developers
Pipedream excels at blending simple automation with powerful coding capabilities, allowing developers to write custom JavaScript functions within workflows. This developer-centric approach offers more versatility compared to Make. -
Tray.io – Premier "Make" Competitor for API Integrations
Tray.io focuses on complex API integrations and provides a visual platform for journey mapping. It’s perfect for organizations needing extensive customization and deep data connections, making it a strong alternative to Make. -
Parabola – Unique "Make" Alternative for Data Workflows
Parabola specializes in data processing and manipulation, perfect for users focused on transforming datasets before sending them between applications. Its unique features cater to e-commerce and marketing automation scenarios, highlighting its distinct advantage over Make.
Make Alternatives: Feature by Feature Comparison
| Feature | Zapier Details | Make Comparison | Unique/Superior Aspects of Zapier |
|---|---|---|---|
| App Integrations | Supports over 6,000 apps, covering a vast array of categories and industries. | Offers fewer integrations—around 1,000 apps. | Extensive app library allows users to integrate with more tools, enhancing versatility and usability. |
| Zaps and Scenarios | Users create "Zaps" which automate workflows with multi-step processes. | Offers "Scenarios" that provide a similar function but often with less flexibility. | Zapier’s easy-to-follow interface allows users to create complex workflows intuitively. |
| Multi-Step Workflows | Enables users to create workflows involving multiple actions triggered by a single event. | Multi-step scenarios exist but may be more complex to set up. | The simplicity of creating multi-step Zaps makes Zapier more user-friendly for complex automations. |
| Filter and Paths | Allows users to add conditions for when Zaps should run, enabling customizable workflows. | Similar features available, but Zapier’s filters are often seen as more straightforward. | User-friendly filtering options enhance control and specificity in automations. |
| Formatter Tool | Built-in tool for transforming data formats before using them in subsequent steps. | Make offers formatting but may require additional setup. | Zapier’s Formatter tool saves users time by eliminating the need for external data transformations. |
| Task History | Comprehensive overview of task history with detailed logs for troubleshooting. | Task history is available but may be less detailed. | Enhanced task history aids users in identifying issues quicker, improving operational efficiency. |
| User Interface | Intuitive UI designed for ease of use, catering to both beginners and experienced users. | Make’s UI is robust but may be overwhelming for new users. | Zapier’s streamlined interface enhances accessibility, making it easier for non-technical users. |
| Pricing Tiers | Flexible pricing starting with a free plan and scalable options for larger teams, accommodating diverse needs. | Also offers pricing tiers but with fewer features in lower plans. | More affordable entry points allow individuals and small businesses to utilize automation effectively. |
| User Community | Active community with extensive documentation, forums, and customer support available for users. | Decent community support but less extensive documentation. | A vibrant community and support resources make troubleshooting and learning more accessible. |
| Task Limits | Higher task limits in premium tiers, enabling users to scale their automations as needed. | Lower task limits in comparable pricing plans. | Generous task limits allow businesses to automate more without incurring additional costs. |
| Mobile App | Offers a mobile app for managing Zaps on the go, providing flexibility for users. | No dedicated mobile app available. | Mobile accessibility allows users to manage and adjust automations from anywhere, increasing convenience. |
| Built-In Scheduling | Allows users to set up schedules for Zaps to run at specific times or intervals. | Scheduling options are less integrated and intuitive. | The built-in scheduling feature enhances automation capabilities for time-sensitive processes. |
| Webhook Support | Robust webhook capabilities for triggering actions from external services. | Supports webhooks but may be less user-friendly. | Advanced webhook functionality enables more complex data handling and integration options. |
| Email Parsing | Built-in email parser that extracts data from incoming emails for use in workflows. | Requires additional configuration and tools. | Simplifies email automation without needing separate tools or configurations. |
This table starkly outlines how Zapier stands out against Make, showcasing specific user benefits that enhance productivity and streamline processes.
Compare your brand to your competitors
Integration Capabilities for each Make competitor
| Alternative | Supported Integrations | Compatibility Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Zapier | – Google Sheets | Integrates with a wide range of Google services. |
| – Slack | Offers robust messaging capabilities. | |
| – Trello | Direct integration for task and project management. | |
| – Gmail | Seamless integration for email automation. | |
| – Mailchimp | Widely used for email marketing tasks. | |
| – Salesforce | Strong support for CRM functionalities. | |
| – Shopify | Popular for eCommerce automation. | |
| – HubSpot | Integrates for inbound marketing and CRM tasks. | |
| – Asana | Task management compatibility for project workflows. | |
| – Zoom | Live video conferencing automation. | |
| Make | – Google Sheets | Flexible data handling and automation features. |
| – Slack | Extensive features for communication workflows. | |
| – Trello | Allows for complex automation with project management. | |
| – Gmail | Supports email parsing and triggering actions. | |
| – Mailchimp | Connects for advanced email marketing workflows. | |
| – Salesforce | Integrates for CRM automation with customizable logic. | |
| – Shopify | ECommerce automation with detailed customization. | |
| – HubSpot | Supports advanced marketing automation techniques. | |
| – Asana | Offers rich automation options for task management. | |
| – Zoom | Facilitates advanced video meeting automation. |
This table showcases the major integrations supported by Zapier and Make, highlighting their compatibility with popular tools in automation software.
Pros and Cons of each Make Alternative
Here’s a comparison table outlining the primary pros and cons of "Zapier" and "Make," focusing on their relevant strengths and weaknesses:
| Alternative | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Zapier | – User-friendly interface ideal for beginners. – Extensive library of integrations (over 3,000 apps). – Strong community and support resources. – Multi-step workflows and conditional logic available. |
– Can be more costly for power users due to subscription tiers. – Limited customization options compared to other alternatives. – Execution time can be slower for complex workflows. |
| Make | – Highly customizable and flexible workflows. – Visual workflow builder allows for complex automations. – Typically lower cost for extensive usage plans. – Supports real-time data processing and a variety of triggers. |
– Steeper learning curve, potentially challenging for beginners. – Smaller app library compared to Zapier (though still extensive). – Less community support and resources available compared to Zapier. |
This table provides a straightforward comparison of the strengths and weaknesses of Zapier and Make based on typical use cases.
Make vs Competitors: Traffic & Marketing Comparison
Traffic Comparison:
In March 2024, "Zapier" reported an impressive peak organic traffic of around 56.5 million, while "Make" reached approximately 3.68 million. Over the analyzed months, "Zapier" consistently outperformed "Make" in traffic, with its figures hovering between 42 million to 68 million, contrasting with "Make’s" range of 2.5 million to 5.6 million. The significant disparity illustrates Zapier’s broader appeal and strong user engagement compared to Make, positioning it as the dominant player in terms of web traffic.
Top Performing Keywords:
Both brands ranked for various high-traffic keywords, but "Zapier" showed dominance in critical areas like "zapier login," "zapier pricing plans," and "automation software," frequently holding top positions. "Make," while also ranking for many relevant terms, primarily focused on niche keywords like "rpa software" and "no code mobile app builder." Interestingly, "Zapier" capitalized on broader searches, whereas "Make" appears to target a more segmented audience, showcasing a diverging keyword strategy that influences their traffic results.
Conclusions on Visibility and Reach:
Zapier’s outstanding traffic figures indicate a superior online visibility compared to Make, underpinned by a rich array of keywords with high rankings. Furthermore, its extensive use of broadly accessible integration and automation-related terms enhances its reach across diverse audiences. On the other hand, Make’s performance shines in specific niches, particularly around no-code and process automation, but it needs broader keyword engagement to heighten its visibility. Overall, Zapier emerges as the clear leader in online presence and adaptability in a competitive landscape.
Compare your brand to your competitors
Other “Make” Alternatives & Competitors that you can find for free
Here are five alternatives and competitors to "Make" (formerly Integromat) similar to Zapier, along with their key features, strengths, and value propositions:
-
Microsoft Power Automate
- Key Features: Integrates with Microsoft 365 apps, real-time monitoring, AI builder, mobile access.
- Strengths: Seamless integration with Microsoft ecosystem, strong enterprise capabilities, and extensive templates.
- Value Proposition: Empowers users to automate tasks across Microsoft services and third-party applications, enhancing productivity and operational efficiency.
-
Integromat (now Make)
- Key Features: Visual workflow builder, customizable scenarios, extensive app integrations, advanced error-handling.
- Strengths: User-friendly interface, powerful data manipulation capabilities, and cost-effective for heavy users.
- Value Proposition: Offers robust automation solutions for both technical and non-technical users, with a focus on flexibility and ease of use.
-
Automate.io
- Key Features: Multi-app workflows, real-time data syncing, easy-to-use interface, and live chat support.
- Strengths: Affordable pricing, straightforward setup, and a variety of integrations particularly for small businesses.
- Value Proposition: Simplifies workflow automation, making it accessible for businesses of all sizes without needing technical expertise.
-
Tray.io
- Key Features: API-first platform, visual workflow builder, powerful data transformation capabilities, real-time data integration.
- Strengths: Scalability for complex integrations, supports a wide range of connectors, and customization options for developers.
- Value Proposition: Designed for medium to large enterprises that require sophisticated automation and integration solutions.
-
Pipedream
- Key Features: Code-based workflows, event-driven integration, supports JavaScript for custom scripts, and real-time API integrations.
- Strengths: Flexibility for developers, allows for complex use cases, and open-source approach.
- Value Proposition: Ideal for developers looking to create custom, event-driven workflows without the constraints of traditional automation platforms.
These tools cater to different needs within the automation landscape, making it essential to choose one based on specific requirements and use cases.
