Top Make Alternatives & Competitors based on 87 Reviews
Reviews collected from
capterra.com
trustpilot.com
softwareadvice.com
trustradius.com
sitejabber.com
.
| Brand | Pricing |
|---|---|
|
☆ ☆ |
Make offers a tiered pricing model with a free plan that includes basic features. Their paid plans start at $9 per month for the Basic plan, which includes more operations and features. The plans escalate up to $299 per month for the Business plan, allowing for advanced functionalities and higher usage limits. |
|
☆ ☆ |
Zapier’s pricing is also tiered, starting with a free plan that supports basic zaps. The paid plans begin at $19.99 per month, which allows for more tasks and access to advanced features. The top-tier plan reaches $599 per month and includes extensive task limits and premium app integrations. |
Compare your brand to your competitors
Why should you be looking for a Make alternative?
Users often seek alternatives to "Make" due to specific feature requirements, ease of use, budget concerns, and support options. Whether looking for more advanced integrations, a user-friendly interface, or cost-effective solutions, many find they need better-fitting tools. "Zapier" emerges as a leading alternative, catering to a wide range of users with its robust features, competitive pricing, and extensive support. This exploration will delve into these critical factors, comparing features, pricing models, and target user demographics to help determine the best fit.
Quick Overview of Top Make Competitors
-
Zapier (Best Make Alternative for Automation Software)
- Offers over 5,000 integrations with apps and services, making it one of the most expansive platforms in automation.
- Features a user-friendly interface that simplifies building workflows (Zaps) with a straightforward drag-and-drop interface.
- Offers multi-step workflows and conditional logic, allowing for complex automations.
-
Integromat (Powerful Make Competitor for Workflow Automation)
- Known for its visual scenario builder that allows users to create complex workflows easily.
- Provides more advanced features such as data manipulation, scheduling, and error handling.
- Ideal for users looking for detailed control over their automation processes.
-
Automate.io (Affordable Make Alternative for Small Businesses)
- Offers a competitive pricing structure, making it a budget-friendly option for startups and small businesses.
- Supports real-time and scheduled actions with over 200 integrations.
- Simple and intuitive interface reduces the learning curve for new users.
-
Microsoft Power Automate (Enterprise-Level Make Competitor)
- Seamlessly integrates with Microsoft products and services, thus ideal for organizations using Microsoft ecosystems.
- Allows building complex workflows across multiple platforms, and provides AI-driven automation capabilities.
- Strong security features and compliance protocols suitable for enterprise environments.
-
Workato (Robust Make Alternative for Business Automation)
- Focuses on integration and automation for enterprises, allowing for more powerful and complex scenarios.
- Has a rich library of pre-built recipes for common business workflows, enabling quick deployment.
- Offers enterprise-grade security and governance features, appealing to larger organizations.
-
Pipedream (Developer-Friendly Make Competitor)
- Provides a flexible platform for developers to create and run workflows using code, allowing for custom automation solutions.
- Features real-time event-driven architecture, ideal for applications requiring instant responses.
- Supports extensive integrations with APIs, making it suitable for tech-savvy users.
-
IFTTT (Simplest Make Alternative for Individuals)
- Focuses on simple trigger-action setups (Applets) ideal for everyday users and personal automation tasks.
- Easy to use with a minimal setup process compared to more complex alternatives.
- Excellent for connecting smart home devices and personal apps without intricate configurations.
-
Parabola (Data-Focused Make Competitor)
- Targets data-driven workflows, allowing users to automate tasks involving data manipulation and reporting with ease.
- Its visual editor is tailored for handling data, making it easier for non-coders to set up complicated operations.
- Integrates with various data sources, providing flexibility in automation tasks related to data processing.
Make Alternatives: Feature by Feature Comparison
| Feature | Zapier | Make | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Over 6,000 integrations with apps and services. | Over 1,000 integrations available. | Zapier’s larger library allows users to connect a wider variety of applications effortlessly. |
| User Interface | Intuitive, user-friendly drag-and-drop interface that simplifies workflow creation. | Visual builder and modular approach may require a steeper learning curve for some users. | Zapier’s interface is generally viewed as more accessible, particularly for less technical users. |
| Workflow Complexity | Supports multi-step workflows allowing for a sequence of actions across different apps. | Offers advanced functionality for complex workflows, including conditional logic and branching. | Make excels with its ability to handle complex workflows, though Zapier’s simplicity may benefit users seeking straightforward automation. |
| Real-time Triggers | Instantaneous triggers for immediate action as events occur. | Supports a polling mechanism; real-time may require premium plans. | Zapier’s real-time capabilities provide immediate execution, making it advantageous for time-sensitive tasks. |
| Task History | Detailed task history for each zap, showing success or failure, which helps in troubleshooting. | Task logging is available but can be less comprehensive. | Zapier offers better transparency and tracking options, aiding users in monitoring workflow performance effectively. |
| Customer Support | 24/7 email support and extensive library of articles, tutorials, and webinars. | Provides community support and documentation, but lacks dedicated 24/7 support. | Zapier’s comprehensive support resources offer distinct advantages for users needing immediate assistance. |
| Template Library | Extensive pre-built templates for common use cases to jumpstart workflows. | Templates are also available, but not as robust or diverse as Zapier’s. | Zapier’s wealth of templates saves time for users looking to implement common automations quickly. |
| Multi-app Workflows | Allows integration of multiple apps in a single workflow seamlessly. | Capable of linking multiple apps but may require more setup time. | While both platforms support multi-app workflows, Zapier streamlines this process, enhancing user experience. |
| Application Connection | Robust API integrations that ensure reliable app connections, with built-in error handling. | Connections can be strong, but may vary based on app compatibility. | Zapier’s reliability in connections is particularly beneficial for users focused on maintaining uninterrupted automation. |
| Collaboration Features | Easy sharing of zaps with team members for effective collaboration. | Allows invite-only collaboration, though less intuitive. | Zapier’s sharing capabilities foster teamwork more easily, enhancing cooperation among users. |
| Pricing Structure | Pricing tiers based on the number of tasks, providing flexibility for users with diverse needs. | Slightly more competitive pricing for specific functionalities, but can add costs for premium features. | Zapier’s pricing can accommodate varied user needs better, especially for those requiring high-volume automation. |
| Mobile Accessibility | Fully functional mobile app for managing workflows and alerts on-the-go. | Basic mobile interface; lacks full functionality of desktop version. | Zapier offers superior mobile capabilities, catering to users requiring automation management while away from the desk. |
| Data Transfer Options | Seamless data transfer between applications with built-in field mapping. | Data transfer options available but may require manual setup. | Zapier simplifies the data transfer process, making it user-friendly for those unfamiliar with technical setup. |
| Error Handling | Automated error management features allowing users to resolve issues with minimal hassle. | Error alerts available, but less automated resolution guidance. | Zapier’s advanced error handling minimizes disruption for users, leading to a smoother workflow experience. |
Compare your brand to your competitors
Integration Capabilities for each Make competitor
| Alternative | Supported Integrations | Compatibility Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Zapier | – Google Workspace | Seamless integration with Gmail, Sheets, Docs, etc. |
| – Slack | Supports messaging and notification automation | |
| – Trello | Provides task and project management integration | |
| – Mailchimp | Email marketing automation, including campaign creation | |
| – Salesforce | CRM integration for lead and customer management | |
| – Shopify | E-commerce platform integration for order management | |
| – Dropbox | File storage and sharing automation | |
| – Asana | Task and project management tool integration | |
| Social media automation for tweets and engagement | ||
| – Google Sheets | Data organization and team collaboration | |
| Make | – Google Workspace | Similar integration as Zapier with added flexibility |
| – Slack | Offers advanced automation scenarios using workflows | |
| – Trello | Customizable task and project integration | |
| – Mailchimp | Allows for detailed email campaign automation | |
| – Salesforce | CRM capabilities similar to Zapier | |
| – Shopify | E-commerce and sales process automation | |
| – Dropbox | File management and sharing with enhanced features | |
| – Asana | Integration for complex project workflows | |
| Supports tweets and bot-like automation | ||
| – Google Sheets | Provides a wider range of data manipulation tools |
The table above highlights the major third-party integrations supported by Zapier and Make, specifically focusing on popular tools within the automation software space. Each platform offers comparable compatibility with various services, enabling users to automate their workflows effectively.
Pros and Cons of each Make Alternative
Below is a comparison table outlining the primary pros and cons of Zapier and Make (formerly Integromat) based on their typical use cases.
| Alternative | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Zapier | – User-friendly interface | – Limited customization for complex workflows |
| – Extensive app integrations | – Higher pricing tiers for advanced features | |
| – Reliable support and documentation | – No visual workflow builder; linear process only | |
| – Powerful automation for simple tasks | – Task limits may restrict usage for larger businesses | |
| – Multi-step Zaps available | – Learning curve for advanced functionality | |
| – Good community and resources | – Limited ability to handle more intricate operations | |
| Make | – Visual workflow builder | – Steeper learning curve for new users |
| – More powerful automation capabilities | – Fewer available integrations than Zapier | |
| – Greater flexibility and customization | – Some users report less reliable performance | |
| – Modular setup allows for more complex scenarios | – Can be overwhelming for basic tasks | |
| – Cost-effective for heavy users | – Support may not be as responsive | |
| – Real-time data processing | – Initial setup can be time-consuming |
This table compares both platforms in terms of their typical strengths and weaknesses, helping users make informed decisions based on their specific needs.
Make vs Competitors: Traffic & Marketing Comparison
Traffic Comparison:
Zapier attracts significantly higher organic traffic than Make. In November 2025, Zapier’s traffic peaked at approximately 25.77 million, with a steady monthly decline culminating in approximately 19.59 million by September 2026. In contrast, Make’s data is absent, indicating either negligible or no recorded organic traffic, suggesting that Make struggles to establish visibility online compared to Zapier, which consistently garners substantial traffic across multiple months.
Top Performing Keywords:
Both brands excel in similar keyword categories, including "workflow solutions," "marketing automation," and "email automation," with each holding a top rank of 1. However, notable differences arise: Make’s keywords exhibit a stronger emphasis on AI tools and platforms, while Zapier also highlights "workflow tools" more prominently. This suggests that Make’s strategy leans towards AI-centric keywords, while Zapier employs broader terms appealing to a wider audience, leading to its higher traffic volume.
Conclusions on Visibility and Reach:
Zapier clearly demonstrates stronger online visibility, evidenced by its substantial organic traffic and diversified keyword reach. With a strategic focus on high-traffic keywords across automation and workflow management, it secures significant user engagement. Make, lacking traffic data, indicates lower visibility, potentially limiting its audience reach. While both target similar niches, Zapier’s holistic approach reinforces its dominance, particularly in automation solutions, enhancing its market presence compared to Make.
Compare your brand to your competitors
Other “Make” Alternatives & Competitors that you can find for free
Here are five alternatives to "Make" (formerly Integromat) along with their key features, strengths, and value propositions:
-
Zapier
- Key Features: Automation of workflows between over 3,000 apps, multi-step Zaps, filters, and conditional logic.
- Strengths: User-friendly interface, extensive app integration library, and a vast community with pre-built templates.
- Value Proposition: Simplifies automation for non-technical users, enabling small businesses to integrate and automate tasks quickly.
-
Automate.io
- Key Features: Drag-and-drop interface, multi-step workflows, task scheduling, and customizable data mapping.
- Strengths: Competitive pricing, good range of integrations, and real-time data sync.
- Value Proposition: Provides affordable automation solutions for small to medium-sized businesses, focusing on simplicity and ease of use.
-
Tray.io
- Key Features: API integration, flexible workflows, and advanced data manipulation capabilities.
- Strengths: Powerful for developers and teams needing complex integrations, with the ability to handle large data volumes.
- Value Proposition: Offers robust, scalable automation solutions for enterprises and technical users, enabling full customization and control.
-
Microsoft Power Automate
- Key Features: Integration with Microsoft 365, built-in templates, AI capabilities, and instant notifications.
- Strengths: Seamless integration with Microsoft products, great for organizations heavily using the Microsoft ecosystem.
- Value Proposition: Bridges automation across Microsoft apps and third-party services, enhancing productivity within enterprise environments.
-
n8n
- Key Features: Open-source, self-hosted option, customizable workflows, and extensive integration options.
- Strengths: Flexibility allows users to create detailed and specific automation without vendor lock-in, strong community support.
- Value Proposition: Ideal for businesses that want control over their automation tooling, while also benefiting from a wide range of integrations and customization.
These alternatives provide a variety of features and pricing structures to cater to different automation needs and organizational sizes.
