
Top Make Alternatives & Competitors based on 87 Reviews
Brand | Rating | Pricing |
---|---|---|
|
★ ★ ★ ☆ 3.1 | Make offers a variety of pricing plans, including a free tier that allows for limited operations per month. Paid plans start with a Basic plan for $9 per month that includes more operations, with higher tiers (Core, Pro, and Teams) providing additional features such as advanced functions, multiple users, and increased operations scaling up to $299 per month. Discounts are available for annual subscriptions. |
|
★ ★ ★ ☆ 3.4 | Zapier provides a free plan that includes basic functionality with limited Zaps and tasks. The paid plans range from Starter at $19.99 per month, which allows for more tasks and multi-step Zaps, to higher-tier plans like Professional, Team, and Company, offering advanced features, increased task limits, and priority support, with the Company plan reaching up to $599 per month. Annual billing discounts are available. |
Compare your brand to your competitors
Why should you be looking for a Make alternative?
Users often seek alternatives to "Make" due to specific feature requirements, a preference for ease of use, budget constraints, or support options that better fit their needs. In this context, "Zapier" emerges as a leading alternative, renowned for its user-friendly interface and extensive integration capabilities. This comparison will delve into key factors such as available features, pricing structures, and the target audience for each platform, helping users make an informed decision based on their unique workflows and requirements.
Quick Overview of Top Make Competitors
-
Zapier (Best Make Competitor for Small Businesses)
Offers a user-friendly interface and thousands of app integrations. Ideal for small businesses needing quick automation without coding skills. Strong community support and extensive documentation. -
Integromat (Cheapest Make Alternative)
Competitive pricing with a feature set that includes a visual editor and robust data manipulation options. Best for users who need detailed workflows and advanced automation capabilities. -
Automate.io (Best Make Competitor for E-commerce)
Focused on e-commerce integrations, making it a perfect solution for online stores. Features a simple drag-and-drop interface and supports multiple actions per trigger, enhancing workflow complexity without sacrificing ease. -
Workato (Top-tier Make Alternative for Enterprises)
Comprehensive integration automation designed for enterprises, emphasizing security and scalability. Offers advanced features like AI-driven automation and extensive pre-built connectors for various software applications. -
Pipedream (Innovative Make Competitor for Developers)
Emphasizes developer flexibility with the ability to write custom code within workflows. Ideal for technical users looking to create complex integrations. Offers a wide range of integrations with popular developer tools. -
Tray.io (Robust Make Alternative for Data Management)
Known for its powerful data integration capabilities, making it ideal for teams handling large datasets. Provides advanced customization options and a visual workflow builder, catering to businesses that require tailored solutions. -
Zoho Flow (Best Make Competitor for Existing Zoho Users)
Seamlessly integrates with the Zoho ecosystem, making it a strong choice for businesses already using Zoho products. Simple automation processes and rich feature sets focused on enhancing productivity within the Zoho platform. -
Microsoft Power Automate (Secure Make Alternative for Enterprises)
Strong integration with Microsoft products, making it particularly beneficial for businesses within the Microsoft ecosystem. Features AI capabilities and enhanced security options, catering to enterprise-level needs for reliability and compliance.
Make Alternatives: Feature by Feature Comparison
Feature | Zapier | Make | Comparison / Unique Aspects |
---|---|---|---|
App Integrations | Over 6,000 apps available for integration. | Supports over 1,000 apps. | Zapier offers a broader number of integrations, giving users more flexibility to connect varied tools. |
User Interface | Intuitive, user-friendly dashboard that simplifies workflow creation. | More complex interface; may require a steeper learning curve. | Zapier’s ease of use is ideal for beginners and non-technical users, while Make may appeal to advanced users. |
Workflow Triggers | Instant triggers that activate workflows in real-time. | Delayed triggers; may have a polling frequency. | Zapier enables immediate action on triggers, which is crucial for time-sensitive tasks. |
Multi-step Workflows | Supports multi-step automations seamlessly. | Also supports multi-step workflows, but complexity can increase. | Zapier streamlines the creation of complex workflows without overwhelming the user. |
Templates | Offers a vast library of pre-built templates (more than 2,500). | Limited templates available compared to Zapier. | Zapier’s extensive template library helps users get started quickly without building from scratch. |
Conditional Logic | Easy to implement conditional logic (Paths) that guides workflows based on specific criteria. | Offers similar conditional features, but less intuitive. | Zapier’s Paths feature is more user-friendly, allowing easier navigation in complex setups. |
Built-in Apps | Features built-in apps like filters, formatters, and code. | Limited built-in features may require external app usage. | Zapier’s built-in tools enhance productivity by reducing dependence on additional applications. |
Collaboration | Allows easy sharing of Zaps with team members and client collaboration. | Supports collaboration but can be less streamlined. | Zapier’s collaborative features make it more suitable for teams working on shared projects. |
Support & Resources | Extensive resources, including help articles, community forums, and customer support. | Support resources are more limited and less extensive. | Zapier’s vast library of learning resources and community support provides better assistance to users. |
Payment & Subscription Flexibility | Offers a variety of pricing plans that scale with user needs, ensuring adaptability. | Less scalable options, sometimes leading to higher costs for growth. | Zapier’s tiered plans allow users to start small and expand seamlessly as their needs grow. |
Mobile Access | Mobile app available allowing users to manage automations on-the-go. | Lacks a dedicated mobile app, limiting accessibility. | Zapier offers mobile functionality for users needing to manage tasks remotely or on-the-go. |
Performance Speed | Generally faster execution speed, especially for real-time tasks. | May experience latency due to polling mechanisms. | Zapier’s superior performance speed can significantly improve user productivity, especially for time-sensitive tasks. |
This table delineates the key features of both Zapier and Make, demonstrating how Zapier excels in integration breadth, user experience, and support resources—all crucial for users looking for efficient automation solutions.
Compare your brand to your competitors
Integration Capabilities for each Make competitor
Alternative | Supported Integrations | Compatibility Notes |
---|---|---|
Zapier | Over 6,000 apps | Highly versatile; includes popular tools like Google Apps, Slack, Trello, and Mailchimp. Strong support for marketing, sales, and productivity apps. |
Make | Over 1,000 apps | Focuses on visual flow; supports tools such as Google Sheets, Airtable, and Asana. Less extensive compared to Zapier but strong in visual automation and complex workflows. |
Pros and Cons of each Make Alternative
Here’s a comparison table outlining the primary pros and cons for "Zapier" and "Make."
Alternative | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|
Zapier | – Extensive library of pre-built integrations with thousands of apps. – User-friendly interface that is easy to navigate. – Robust support resources, including tutorials and community forums. – Strong focus on automation triggers and actions, making it efficient for simple workflows. – Quick setup for users with limited technical expertise. |
– Limited customization options compared to more advanced automation platforms. – Higher cost for premium features and large volumes of tasks. – Can become costly for businesses with extensive automation needs. – Less flexibility in managing complex workflows compared to some competitors. |
Make | – Highly customizable, allowing for complex workflows with advanced logic. – Visual scenario builder that offers a clear view of process flows. – Capable of handling multi-step processes and conditional operations effectively. – Competitive pricing models that can cater to varying levels of usage. – Offers more flexibility in connecting and manipulating data between apps. |
– Steeper learning curve, especially for non-technical users. – Less user-friendly interface compared to Zapier. – Smaller app ecosystem compared to Zapier, with fewer pre-built integrations. – More technical configuration may be required for complex scenarios, potentially increasing setup time. |
This table aims to provide a clear comparison of "Zapier" and "Make" based on their respective strengths and weaknesses in typical use cases.
Make vs Competitors: Traffic & Marketing Comparison
Traffic Comparison: In the comparison of organic traffic, Zapier significantly outperforms Make. In January 2025, Zapier achieved 1,745,659 visits, while Make attracted only 317,337 visits in the same month. Over the preceding year, Zapier consistently maintained traffic levels above 1.5 million, showcasing robust online presence, whereas Make’s traffic peaked at 390,992 in December 2024, indicating a marked disparity in audience engagement and reach, with Zapier emerging as the clear leader in organic traffic.
Top Performing Keywords: The keyword strategies reveal distinct approaches; Make excels in niche keywords like "sales automation" (ranked 1) and "workflow automation" (ranked 1), while Zapier dominates general search terms such as "zapier integration" (ranked 1) and "zapier account" (ranked 1). Both brands perform well in “no code” and “automation software,” but Zapier’s more extensive keyword rankings offer greater visibility. Make’s high efficiency in specific keywords indicates a targeted approach, while Zapier’s broader reach leverages diverse keywords to attract traffic.
Conclusions on Visibility and Reach: Based on organic traffic and keyword reach, Zapier showcases the strongest online visibility, holding 20 keywords in the top ranking positions compared to Make’s 14. Specifically, Zapier dominates high-traffic niches like "zapier integration" and "workflow automation platform," underscoring its broader appeal. Meanwhile, Make’s focused approach in sales and workflow automation appeals to specific audiences. Overall, Zapier’s extensive reach solidifies its position as a market leader in the automation sector, overshadowing Make’s performance in visibility.
Compare your brand to your competitors
Other “Make” Alternatives & Competitors that you can find for free
Here are five alternatives to "Make" (formerly Integromat) along with their key features, strengths, and value propositions:
-
Zapier
- Key Features: Connects over 3,000 apps, multi-step workflows, filters, and built-in app integrations.
- Strengths: User-friendly interface, extensive app directory, reliable performance.
- Value Proposition: Streamlines automation processes for businesses of all sizes with ease of use and a vast array of integrations.
-
Microsoft Power Automate
- Key Features: Automated workflows across Microsoft and third-party apps, AI builder integration, templates for quick setup.
- Strengths: Deep integration with Microsoft services, enterprise-grade security, and powerful data manipulation features.
- Value Proposition: Ideal for enterprises using Microsoft 365, enabling seamless automation across various Microsoft and non-Microsoft applications.
-
IFTTT (If This Then That)
- Key Features: Simple conditional triggers, applets that create automation, support for multiple devices and services.
- Strengths: Intuitive interface, great for personal automations, and direct smart home integrations.
- Value Proposition: Perfect for individuals looking to connect a variety of web services and smart devices in their daily lives without needing technical expertise.
-
Integromat (Make)
- Key Features: Visual scenario builder, detailed logs and error handling, HTTP/SOAP and JSON modules.
- Strengths: Powerful for complex automations, real-time updates, and flexibility in designing workflows.
- Value Proposition: Provides advanced users with the tools to create sophisticated automations, ideal for technical teams and developers.
-
Automate.io
- Key Features: Multi-step automation, conditional logic, data mapping, and a user-friendly drag-and-drop builder.
- Strengths: Affordable pricing plans, supports many popular business apps, and easy learning curve.
- Value Proposition: Offers a user-friendly experience for small to medium-sized businesses looking for cost-effective automation solutions.
These platforms provide various features that cater to different user needs, ranging from complex enterprise automations to simple personal tasks.