Top Make Alternatives & Competitors based on 87 Reviews
Reviews collected from
capterra.com
trustpilot.com
softwareadvice.com
trustradius.com
sitejabber.com
.
| Brand | Pricing |
|---|---|
|
☆ ☆ |
Make offers a tiered pricing model with four main plans: Free, Core, Pro, and Teams. The Free plan provides limited functionality, while the Core plan starts at a modest monthly fee and includes more operations and access to advanced features. The Pro plan is designed for individuals with higher needs, offering additional operations and integrations. The Teams plan caters to collaborative environments, featuring multi-user functionalities and higher limits on operations. |
|
☆ ☆ |
Zapier also utilizes a tiered pricing structure with four primary plans: Free, Starter, Professional, and Team. The Free plan allows users to create simple automations with limited functionality. The Starter plan offers more features and higher task limits for individual users. The Professional plan provides advanced automation options and premium app integrations, while the Team plan is tailored for organizations, granting collaboration features, shared workflows, and enhanced task limits. |
Compare your brand to your competitors
Why should you be looking for a Make alternative?
Users often seek alternatives to Make due to specific feature needs, ease of use, budget constraints, and support options. As businesses evolve, they may require integrations with diverse applications, simplified workflows, or cost-effective solutions. Zapier stands out as a leading alternative, offering robust automation features tailored to various users, from small businesses to large enterprises. This exploration will delve into Zapier’s capabilities, pricing structure, and suitability for different target audiences, helping users make informed decisions about their automation needs.
Quick Overview of Top Make Competitors
-
Zapier (Best Make Alternative for Automation Software)
Offers an extensive library of integrations with over 5,000 apps, making it ideal for users who need broad compatibility. Zapier’s user-friendly interface and powerful automation capabilities simplify workflow management. It features multi-step automations (Zaps) and allows for conditional logic, enhancing task complexity beyond basic tasks. -
Integromat (Best Make Competitor for Complex Automations)
Known for its visual flow builder, Integromat enables users to create intricate automation scenarios easily. Its real-time data processing and ability to handle complex operations, including HTTP requests and variable manipulation, provide robust automation solutions. Integromat also boasts a diverse set of pre-built templates. -
Automate.io (Cheapest Make Alternative)
Focused on affordability, Automate.io offers competitive pricing plans for small businesses. It supports two-way integrations and allows users to synchronize apps seamlessly. The platform includes a simple drag-and-drop interface and pre-configured integrations, making it accessible for users with varying tech skills. -
Microsoft Power Automate (Strong Make Alternative for Microsoft Ecosystems)
Best suited for enterprises utilizing Microsoft products, Power Automate integrates seamlessly with Office 365 applications. Features such as AI Builder and robotic process automation (RPA) empower users to automate complex business processes, which is a step above the capabilities offered by Make. -
Workato (Premium Make Competitor for Enterprises)
Targeted at larger organizations, Workato excels in integrating and automating across numerous platforms with enterprise-ready security features. Its powerful recipe creation allows for advanced automations, including conditional logic, and it supports complex workflows to meet diverse business needs. -
Pipedream (Developer-Focused Make Competitor)
Appeals to developers seeking a customizable automation platform. Pipedream allows users to write custom code as part of their workflows and integrate with APIs directly. The platform’s open architecture provides more flexibility compared to Make, especially for those with programming knowledge. -
Trello Automations (Niche Make Alternative for Project Management)
Specifically designed for Trello users, this tool automates task management with built-in features for automating Trello boards. It offers a simple way to create rules and triggers, making it an excellent choice for teams who heavily rely on Trello for tracking projects and tasks.
Make Alternatives: Feature by Feature Comparison
| Feature | Zapier | Make | Comparison Highlights |
|---|---|---|---|
| App Integrations | Supports over 6,000 apps, allowing extensive connectivity. | Supports over 1,000 apps, but fewer than Zapier. | Zapier provides a significantly larger library of app integrations, facilitating more options for users. |
| Custom Workflows | Users can create multi-step workflows with conditional logic (Paths) to handle complex scenarios. | Offers visual scenario building with scenarios containing multiple routes. | Zapier’s Paths allows for easier conditional logic without extensive configuration. |
| User Interface | Clean and intuitive interface focused on ease of use, especially for non-technical users. | Provides a more complex visual interface that can be overwhelming for beginners. | Zapier’s user-friendly design is superior for users with limited technical knowledge. |
| Task Automation | Automatic data transfers between apps in real-time, ensuring timely updates without user intervention. | Allows automation but often requires manual triggers or setup for real-time updates. | Zapier excels in real-time automation, making it more efficient for users who need immediate responses. |
| Support and Community | Extensive support resources, including tutorials, customer service, and an active user community for troubleshooting. | Provides documentation and community support but generally less extensive than Zapier. | Zapier’s robust support options offer users quicker solutions and help in maximizing the platform usage. |
| Monitoring and Logs | Real-time monitoring with detailed logs for each task, allowing users to track performance effectively. | Offers basic logging but lacks the depth of monitoring found in Zapier. | Zapier’s advanced monitoring provides users with better insights and operational control. |
| Multi-user Collaboration | Team features allow users to share access and workflows, facilitating collaboration. | Offers team collaboration options but with limited functionality compared to Zapier. | Zapier’s team management features enhance collaborative workflows significantly more. |
| Pricing | Competitive pricing tiers, including a free plan that offers essential features for beginners. | Also offers a free plan but may become costly as user requirements increase. | Zapier provides a wider array of features at competitive prices, making it more accessible for users. |
| Conditional Logic | Powerful conditional logic capabilities to customize automation based on specific triggers and criteria. | Supports some level of conditional automation but may have limitations in complexity. | Zapier’s advanced conditions give users the ability to craft precise and tailored automation. |
| Data Formatting | Built-in tools for data formatting and manipulation (e.g., filtering, splitting, formatting text). | Provides tools for data handling but often requires additional configuration. | Zapier’s user-friendly data formatting tools save users time and effort during setup. |
| Advanced Analytics | Offers integration with analytics tools to provide insights into workflow performance and efficiency. | Limited analytics capabilities built into the platform; relies on external tools. | Zapier’s analytics capabilities ensure users can effectively measure their workflow success. |
| Mobile Access | Provides a mobile app for managing automations on-the-go. | Does not offer a native mobile app; rely on the web interface. | Zapier’s mobile app enables users to manage automations wherever they are, enhancing flexibility. |
Conclusion: Zapier stands out in various aspects, particularly in app integrations, ease of use, and customer support, making it an ideal choice for users looking for efficient and effective automation solutions.
Compare your brand to your competitors
Integration Capabilities for each Make competitor
| Alternative | Supported Integrations | Compatibility Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Zapier | Salesforce, Slack, Google Sheets, Trello, Mailchimp, Zoom, Twitter, Shopify, HubSpot | Strong focus on SaaS apps; user-friendly interface; extensive library of integrations. |
| Make | Salesforce, Slack, Google Sheets, Trello, Mailchimp, Zoom, Twitter, Shopify, HubSpot | Visual automation with sequence flow; offers complex integrations with less coding required. |
| Jira, Asana, Notion, Airtable, Shopify, Google Drive, QuickBooks, HubSpot | Supports a wide variety of apps but may have limitations depending on specific use cases. | |
| Facebook, Instagram, Airtable, Dropbox, Discord, WooCommerce, Xero | Works well for eCommerce and social media management. |
Conclusion
Both Zapier and Make offer extensive integrations with a focus on popular automation tools. Their compatibility with essential software ensures that users can automate workflows effectively, whether they prefer simple task automation (Zapier) or more complex scripted workflows (Make).
Pros and Cons of each Make Alternative
Here’s a comparison table outlining the primary pros and cons of "Zapier" compared to "Make":
| Alternative | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Zapier | – Extensive app integrations (over 3,000) – User-friendly interface with a low learning curve – Strong support and community resources – Reliable performance with high uptime – Supports multi-step workflows |
– Pricing can escalate with advanced features – Limited customization for complex workflows – Fewer built-in functions for data manipulation – Higher dependency on third-party apps for functionality |
| Make | – Advanced automation capabilities with visual workflow builder – Extensive data manipulation and operations available – Flexible pricing tiers based on actual usage – Strong support for complex logic and branching workflows – Supports webhooks and API integrations efficiently |
– Fewer integrations compared to Zapier (over 1,000) – Steeper learning curve for beginners – Interface may feel cluttered to some users – Documentation and community support is less extensive than Zapier |
This table should help in comparing the strengths and weaknesses of Zapier and Make based on typical use cases.
Make vs Competitors: Traffic & Marketing Comparison
Traffic Comparison:
Zapier significantly outperforms Make in organic traffic. For example, in March 2026, Zapier’s traffic reached approximately 38.2 million visits, showcasing a consistent upward trend in recent months, whereas Make shows no recorded organic traffic data. This indicates that Zapier is effectively attracting substantial visitors, validating its presence in the market, while Make’s lack of traffic suggests either limited visibility or a new brand presence with little to no online traction.
Top Performing Keywords:
Make excels with high-ranking keywords like "workflow tools," "ai platform," and "automated customer service," all at position 1, suggesting a focused strategy around workflow and AI automation. In contrast, Zapier ranks strongly for "workflow solutions" and "document automation" at position 1, but with a broader keyword spread including variations like "email automation" (8th position). This indicates Make’s more concentrated approach while Zapier targets a diverse range of keywords related to automation, which might appeal to a wider audience.
Conclusions on Visibility and Reach:
Zapier emerges as the clear leader in online visibility with robust organic traffic and a varied keyword portfolio. It is well-positioned in multiple aspects of automation, giving it an extensive reach. In contrast, Make may have niche authority in some workflows but lacks visibility due to insufficient traffic data. While Make holds strong keyword positions in specific areas, Zapier’s broader keyword rankings and high traffic volumes solidify its dominance in the online landscape, particularly in automated solutions.
Compare your brand to your competitors
Other “Make” Alternatives & Competitors that you can find for free
Here are five alternatives and competitors to "Make" (formerly Integromat), along with their key features, strengths, and value propositions:
-
Zapier
- Key Features: Workflow automation, multi-step Zaps, extensive app integrations (over 3,000 apps), custom logic with paths, filters, and delays.
- Strengths: User-friendly interface, robust app library, and easy to set up automations without coding.
- Value Proposition: Provides businesses of all sizes with an easy way to integrate apps and automate workflows, saving time and reducing manual tasks.
-
Automate.io
- Key Features: Multi-action workflows, support for over 200 apps, integration of cloud storage and marketing tools, and data field mapping.
- Strengths: Affordable pricing plans, user-friendly interface, and strong customer support.
- Value Proposition: Offers a simple solution for small to medium-sized businesses to automate repetitive tasks and enhance productivity without technical know-how.
-
Tray.io
- Key Features: Visual workflow builder, advanced API integrations, scalability for enterprise-level processes, and robust data handling.
- Strengths: Highly customizable for complex workflows and high-volume data processing; caters well to larger organizations.
- Value Proposition: Empowers teams to build flexible integrations and automations that adapt to their unique business needs, driving operational efficiency.
-
Microsoft Power Automate
- Key Features: Automated workflows across Microsoft and third-party applications, AI-based automation, templates, and integrated with Microsoft ecosystem.
- Strengths: Seamless integration with other Microsoft products, extensive connectors, and suitable for enterprises with existing Microsoft tools.
- Value Proposition: Enables companies to automate processes within their Microsoft infrastructure and beyond, improving productivity and collaboration.
-
Integromat (Now Make)
- Key Features: Visual scenario builder, real-time execution, Router for conditional paths, and error handling tools.
- Strengths: Flexible and powerful automations, supports a wide variety of data manipulation tasks, and suitable for complex workflows.
- Value Proposition: Facilitates integration and automation at scale, particularly appealing to users needing deeper control over data and workflows.
Each of these platforms offers unique strengths and features designed to meet various automation needs, catering to different business sizes and complexities.
