Top Make Alternatives & Competitors based on 87 Reviews
Reviews collected from
capterra.com
trustpilot.com
softwareadvice.com
trustradius.com
sitejabber.com
.
| Brand | Pricing |
|---|---|
|
☆ ☆ |
Make.com offers a tiered pricing model with four plans: Free, Basic, Standard, and Professional. The Free plan allows for basic functionality, while Basic starts at $9/month with increased features. Standard at $29/month offers more operations and advanced functionalities, and Professional at $99/month includes all features and priority support. |
|
☆ ☆ |
Zapier provides a tiered pricing structure with four main plans: Free, Starter, Professional, and Team. The Free plan offers limited functionality for individual use. Starter begins at $19.99/month with additional Zaps and functionalities. Professional at $49/month offers advanced features and Logic Paths, while the Team plan at $299/month is designed for collaboration and includes more extensive support. |
Compare your brand to your competitors
Why should you be looking for a Make alternative?
Users often seek alternatives to "Make" due to specific feature requirements, a need for simpler interfaces, budget constraints, or the availability of better support options. "Zapier" emerges as a top contender, appealing to those who prioritize intuitive design and a robust app ecosystem. In this comparison, we will delve into critical factors such as features offered, pricing structures, and target user demographics. By examining these elements, we aim to guide users in making informed decisions tailored to their unique automation needs.
Quick Overview of Top Make Competitors
-
Zapier – Best Make Alternative for Automation Software
Zapier is widely recognized for its ease of use and extensive app integrations, boasting over 5,000 available applications. Its intuitive interface allows users to create automated workflows (Zaps) without coding knowledge. The platform offers advanced features like multi-step Zaps and Conditional Logic, making it a robust choice for both simple and complex automations. -
Integromat – Powerful Make Competitor
Now rebranded as Make 2.0, Integromat offers advanced automation possibilities with a visual workflow builder. It excels in handling complex integrations and data manipulation. Users can connect to multiple modules, allowing for rich data transformations and enhanced control over automation processes, which is ideal for users needing more than basic task automation. -
Automate.io – Budget-Friendly Make Alternative
Automate.io is known for its affordability while still providing powerful automation capabilities. With a user-friendly interface, it allows for straightforward automation of tasks between popular apps. It has features like a simple drag-and-drop builder and multi-step workflows, catering well to small businesses or individuals looking for cost-effective automation solutions. -
Pipedream – Developer-Focused Make Competitor
Pipedream is a unique platform for developers that supports building serverless workflows with extensive customization. It integrates with APIs directly, enabling users to write custom code for unique scenarios. This flexibility allows for more intricate automation solutions compared to standard offerings, making it a compelling choice for technical users. -
Workato – Enterprise-Level Make Alternative
Workato is tailored for enterprise needs, providing high scalability and advanced integrations with a focus on business collaboration. Its strong features like AI-driven automation and recipe library enable teams to automate workflows efficiently across various departments. This makes it a top choice for larger organizations seeking comprehensive business process automation. -
n8n – Open-Source Make Competitor
n8n is an open-source automation platform that emphasizes flexibility and customization. It allows users to self-host and modify workflows according to their needs. With over 200 integrations and the ability to create custom nodes, it is ideal for users looking for a cost-free solution that can be tailored to specific automation requirements without dependency on third-party services.
Make Alternatives: Feature by Feature Comparison
| Feature | Zapier Description | Make Comparison | Unique/Superior Aspects of Zapier |
|---|---|---|---|
| App Integrations | Supports 6,000+ apps, allowing extensive automation options. | Offers a wide range of app connections, though fewer than Zapier. | Greater variety and more robust ecosystem of supported apps, enhancing flexibility. |
| User Interface | User-friendly interface with a focus on accessibility. | More complex interface that may require a steeper learning curve. | Streamlined and simplified setup process, suitable for users of all skill levels. |
| Multi-Step Workflows | Easily create multi-step automations with conditional logic. | Supports multi-step but can be more complicated to configure. | Intuitive conditional workflows to ensure user can design complex automations efficiently. |
| Task History | Detailed task history tracking with error notifications. | Lacks comprehensive task tracking capabilities. | Allows users to trace back actions and troubleshoot failures easily. |
| Zap Templates | Pre-built Zap templates tailored for various use cases. | Offers templates, but with limited scope. | Extensive library of curated templates allowing for rapid deployment of automations. |
| Real-Time Updates | Instant triggers for rapid response actions. | Offers delayed or scheduled actions that may not be real-time. | Enhanced efficiency by rapidly processing incoming data and events. |
| Built-in Apps | Contains built-in tools like Email Parser, Formatter, and more. | Lacks similar comprehensive built-in tools. | Users can perform multiple operations in one platform without relying on external tools. |
| Team Collaboration | Supports shared folders and team management features. | Less emphasis on team features, primarily individual-focused. | Facilitates better team productivity with collaboration-friendly features. |
| Customer Support | 24/7 support and comprehensive resources like guides and forums. | Offers customer support but may not be as extensive. | Strong commitment to customer service ensures user issues are addressed promptly. |
| Mobile App | Full-featured mobile app for managing Zaps on-the-go. | Lacks a dedicated mobile app. | Enables users to manage automations from anywhere, increasing flexibility and responsiveness. |
| Version History | Keeps a record of changes for easy rollbacks. | Does not offer version history for configurations. | Provides users with the ability to revert back to older automation settings without hassle. |
| Integrations with CRMs | Seamless integrations with popular CRMs for lead management. | Supports CRM integrations but might lack specific optimizations. | Enhanced capabilities to automate leads and customer relationships efficiently and effectively. |
| Advanced Filters | Sophisticated filters to refine when actions execute. | Basic filter capabilities, not as refined. | Greater control over workflow execution helps in managing data flows precisely. |
| API Access | Open API allows for custom integrations and development. | Provides API access, but with a more limited approach. | More flexible options for developers to extend functionality as needed. |
This table compares key features of Zapier to Make, highlighting unique and superior aspects of Zapier that cater to the needs of automation enthusiasts and professionals, ensuring maximum efficiency in their workflows.
Compare your brand to your competitors
Integration Capabilities for each Make competitor
| Alternative | Supported Integrations | Compatibility Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Zapier | Over 6,000 apps | Excellent support for popular automation tools like Slack, Trello, Google Sheets, and Mailchimp. Integrations often offer extensive triggers and actions. |
| Make | Over 1,000 apps | Strong support for tools like Airtable, Google Drive, and Shopify. Focuses on complex workflows and scenarios, providing a visual interface for automation. |
Pros and Cons of each Make Alternative
Here’s a comparison table listing the primary pros and cons of "Zapier" and "Make" as alternatives for automation tools:
| Alternative | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Zapier | – User-friendly interface with a low learning curve. | – Limited customization options for more complex workflows. |
| – Extensive library of integrations (over 5,000 apps). | – Pricing can become expensive for larger teams and high usage. | |
| – Strong customer support and resources. | – Conditional workflows are less powerful than competitors. | |
| – Real-time triggers for instant automation. | – Some users report slower processing times for complex Zaps. | |
| – Robust community and documentation for troubleshooting. | – Lesser flexibility in multi-step workflows compared to Make. | |
| Make | – Highly customizable workflows with advanced features. | – Steeper learning curve for new users unfamiliar with the interface. |
| – Better suited for complex automations and scenarios. | – Fewer pre-built integrations compared to Zapier. | |
| – Visual editor makes it easy to design and understand flows. | – Some advanced functionalities may require scripting knowledge. | |
| – Pay-as-you-go pricing model can be more cost-effective for some. | – Performance may vary; some users report occasional downtime. | |
| – Capable of handling multi-step and conditional logic efficiently. | – User interface may feel overwhelming to beginners. |
This table summarizes the relevant strengths and weaknesses of Zapier and Make, helping users decide based on their specific use cases and needs.
Make vs Competitors: Traffic & Marketing Comparison
Traffic Comparison:
In April 2024, Make’s organic traffic started at approximately 3.25 million and peaked at nearly 5.66 million by November 2024. Meanwhile, Zapier consistently attracted significantly higher traffic, starting at about 61.2 million in April 2024, peaking at over 68.05 million in May 2024. This indicates that Zapier has a far stronger appeal and reach in the market, boasting nearly tenfold the traffic of Make, which highlights its dominant position in the workflow automation landscape.
Top Performing Keywords:
Make’s top keywords include "workflow automation platform" and "email automation tools," both ranking at #1, demonstrating strong positioning in specific automation niches. Meanwhile, Zapier’s top-ranking terms such as "zapier app" and "zapier software" also hold the #1 position, but it has a broader keyword strategy with various terms ranked high, showcasing a larger keyword diversity. Notably, both brands compete for keywords like "automation software," indicating overlapping areas of interest yet distinct strategies in execution.
Conclusions on Visibility and Reach:
Based on organic traffic and keyword rankings, Zapier overwhelmingly leads in online visibility and reach compared to Make. While Make performs well in specific automation niches, Zapier’s consistent high traffic and diverse keyword rankings solidify its status as a market leader. The standout performance of Zapier in categories such as AI and email automation tools positions it as the preferred choice for users seeking comprehensive automation solutions, thereby enhancing its competitive advantage in the digital space.
Compare your brand to your competitors
Other “Make” Alternatives & Competitors that you can find for free
Here are five competitors to Make (formerly Integromat) along with their key features, strengths, and value propositions:
-
Zapier
- Key Features: Workflow automation, extensive app integrations, multi-step Zaps, custom filters, and scheduling.
- Strengths: User-friendly interface, robust library of integrations (over 3,000 apps), and strong community support.
- Value Proposition: Simplifies repetitive tasks by automating workflows between various applications, making productivity accessible for non-technical users.
-
Tray.io
- Key Features: Visual workflow builder, API integrations, data transformation capabilities, and real-time workflows.
- Strengths: Highly customizable and scalable for complex integrations, suitable for both technical and non-technical users, and strong focus on enterprise functionalities.
- Value Proposition: Provides businesses the flexibility to automate complex workflows, enabling businesses to connect their entire tech stack seamlessly.
-
Automate.io
- Key Features: Multi-app workflows, real-time data syncing, powerful integration suites, and utility of delayed actions.
- Strengths: Simple interface, cost-effective options for small businesses and startups, and easy-to-use connectors.
- Value Proposition: Offers a straightforward solution for small to medium-sized businesses looking to automate their workflows without complex programming knowledge.
-
Pipedream
- Key Features: Serverless workflow automation, support for code-based workflows, various event sources, and easy integration with APIs.
- Strengths: Flexibility for developers to write custom code, great for technical users, and ability to handle real-time events.
- Value Proposition: Allows developers to create complex integrations quickly while providing a platform that caters to both code-based and no-code automation.
-
n8n
- Key Features: Open-source workflow automation, self-hosting options, extensive integrations, and flexibility in API usage.
- Strengths: Highly customizable with a developer-friendly approach, supports complex workflows, and the ability to self-host for increased control.
- Value Proposition: Provides a powerful, open-source alternative for users who want complete control over their automation processes without being locked into proprietary platforms.
These alternatives cater to a variety of user needs, from simple task automation to complex enterprise workflows, making them viable options depending on the requirements.
